kopphanatic wrote:
I got all but two correct.
dajafi wrote:I don't know enough about China, or probably geopolitics generally, to say "this is right" or "this is wrong," but I found it pretty interesting:
Why we shouldn't worry about China
allentown wrote:
I got em all right.
“So, let me own up to that agenda. It’s to be protected against violent crimes driven by bigotry. It’s to be able to get married. It’s to be able to get a job and it’s to be able to fight for our country. Hey, for those, for those who are worried about the radical homosexual agenda, let me put them on notice – two down, two to go.”
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
WASHINGTON — Frustrated by regular filibusters and other procedural blockades, Senate Democrats are urging their leadership to negotiate with Republicans to change the rules that govern how the Senate does business.
The Democrats would leave intact the ability of the minority party to filibuster legislation and nominations, meaning that in most cases it would still take 60 votes to get anything done in the Senate. But they want to require senators to be on the floor if they intend to try to debate a bill to death and would make other changes to streamline the Senate’s operations, including ending the practice of secret “holds” by a single senator on legislation or nominees.
Republicans are likely to resist, and should no compromise be found, some Democrats are prepared to propose their own package of rules changes on the first day of the session. Doing so could touch off a bitter floor fight, escalate the already high partisan tensions in the chamber and hinder President Obama’s ability to advance legislation.
In a letter to Senator Harry Reid, the majority leader, Democratic senators expressed “strong sentiment” for ending what they see as Republican misuse of Senate process in recent years.
“We believe the current abuse of the rules by the minority threatens the ability of the Senate to do the necessary work of the nation, and we urge you to take steps to bring these abuses of our rules to an end,” said the Dec. 18 letter signed by 56 Democrats and independents, including all Democratic senators remaining in the Congress that opens Jan. 5.
Republicans have cautioned against any unilateral move to rewrite Senate procedure, saying Democrats would regret it if they fall back into the minority
swishnicholson wrote:allentown wrote:
I got em all right.
Missed one. The forces of evil had shaken my confidence on the effect of the health reform on the budget, so I hedged.
Monkeyboy wrote:swishnicholson wrote:allentown wrote:
I got em all right.
Missed one. The forces of evil had shaken my confidence on the effect of the health reform on the budget, so I hedged.
I also missed one, but it was the one about the auto bailout. I remembered Bush talking about it and thought he passed it before leaving office.
The Nightman Cometh wrote:pacino wrote:Governor Stephen Sweeney. We got New Jersey!
what
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:The Nightman Cometh wrote:pacino wrote:Governor Stephen Sweeney. We got New Jersey!
what
both the jersey shore governator and his lieutenant decided to go on vacation at the same time, so someone has to run the state of new jersey. and it's a democrat!