VoxOrion wrote:After what Lott dealt with for suggesting that a racist coot would've saved us all or what not, Reid's gonna end up hanging from a burning cross and getting launched into space or something if this isn't fake.
Sike. He'll be fine (D).
jerseyhoya wrote:So a poll came out with Brown up a point on Coakley. I don't think there's more than a 5-10% chance that the GOP picks up the seat, but it could legitimately end up close.
traderdave wrote:From the article above:
"Harry Reid called me today and apologized for an unfortunate comment reported today,” Obama said. “I accepted Harry's apology without question because I've known him for years, I've seen the passionate leadership he's shown on issues of social justice and I know what's in his heart. As far as I am concerned, the book is closed."
Two things about this - first, I love how easily politicians can get out of trouble. I say something like that in my office and I'm packing my desk before the day is out. Second, I would argue that comments like the one Reid and so many others have uttered do, in fact, reflect what is in their hearts.
kopphanatic wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:So a poll came out with Brown up a point on Coakley. I don't think there's more than a 5-10% chance that the GOP picks up the seat, but it could legitimately end up close.
Coakley hasn't been even been campaigning apparently. At all. That might explain why its so close.
President Obama set a new record last year for getting Congress to vote his way, clinching 96.7 percent of the votes on which he had clearly staked a position.
That was a bit less than 4 percentage points higher than the previous record, set by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965, according to an annual study by Congressional Quarterly.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
jerseyhoya wrote:Saint Elizabeth and the Ego Monster
Great read from NY Mag on the Edwards campaign
They could make a movie about this
jeff2sf wrote:I'm reading this and two things occur to me:
1. We're pretty lucky this guy didn't win
2. The sources seem to be catty, self-important aides who weren't treated very nicely. And I'm sorry if a woman undergoing cancer treatment gets outraged that someone didn't take care of her and her husband's health care. It would stand to reason that you might want to make sure the leader is taken care of and further that as someone undergoing chemo, you might be pissed off that it wasn't.