The Red Tornado wrote:has anyone locked the medicine cabinet at dajafi's house yet?
dajafi wrote:The Red Tornado wrote:has anyone locked the medicine cabinet at dajafi's house yet?
No, I'm good. Obama's won 11 states, he's actually leading in delegates, the map gets better from here, and I don't even have the anti-Clinton thing going anymore.
As much.
Meanwhile, I'm enjoying our thread here but I wonder if the fact that there seems to be not a single Clinton person (Stuey?) tags us all as deeply weird. Maybe it's that we're a sausage factory.
Macho Row wrote:Not counting California, which may end up basically a 50-50 split, MSNBC says Obama will lead the delegate count with roughly 590 to 540 for HRC.
phuturephillies wrote:I'm pro-Bloomberg. Wake me when he enters the race.
Macho Row wrote:Not counting California, which may end up basically a 50-50 split, MSNBC says Obama will lead the delegate count with roughly 590 to 540 for HRC.
Shore wrote:dajafi wrote:The Red Tornado wrote:has anyone locked the medicine cabinet at dajafi's house yet?
No, I'm good. Obama's won 11 states, he's actually leading in delegates, the map gets better from here, and I don't even have the anti-Clinton thing going anymore.
As much.
Meanwhile, I'm enjoying our thread here but I wonder if the fact that there seems to be not a single Clinton person (Stuey?) tags us all as deeply weird. Maybe it's that we're a sausage factory.
Or maybe we're all under 60.
jerseyhoya wrote:Macho Row wrote:Not counting California, which may end up basically a 50-50 split, MSNBC says Obama will lead the delegate count with roughly 590 to 540 for HRC.
Does that include super delegates?
Macho Row wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:Macho Row wrote:Not counting California, which may end up basically a 50-50 split, MSNBC says Obama will lead the delegate count with roughly 590 to 540 for HRC.
Does that include super delegates?
Don't think so. They didn't specify either way, but I think they implied that those totals were the delegates won that will be pledged to the specific candidate.
Here's one for everyone. If California goes for HRC as expected, does Edwards thwart the momentum again by endorsing Obama sometime in the next few days?
The Red Tornado wrote:Maybe you are all not racists?
dajafi wrote:Both campaigns seem to think they can win a war of attrition. I think that if more big Democrats come out for Obama--and really only Gore and Edwards are left--it probably helps him, but maybe more with superdelegates than anything else.
Clinton's speech wasn't awful, I thought. She didn't attack Obama and was classy in mentioning the hurricanes, which I don't think Romney or Huckabee did.
Has McCain gone to bed?
dajafi wrote:phuturephillies wrote:I'm pro-Bloomberg. Wake me when he enters the race.
Bloomberg's too good for our country. He's basically the more ethnic/interesting Romney: great manager, real-world success (much more so than Romney as Bloomberg actually created value in the private sector rather than stripped companies like an Armani marauder). Other difference is that Bloomberg's into sex, drugs and the arts.
That I love the guy and detest The Mitt probably just shows that I'm as dumb as every other American voter.