thephan wrote:1) How could any team ever compare to Ashburn and Kalas? Kalas + anyone else was still darn good, but was that mostly nostalgia because it has always been Kalas + (in many opinions) a throw away since Ashburn.
Brantt wrote:http://philadelphia.phillies.mlb.com/media/video.jsp.content_id=2726840
mozartpc27 wrote:But many, many people do express active enjoyment of LA & Franzke.
mozartpc27 wrote:I don't think this is about Tom McCarthy & Chris Wheeler not living up to an unlivable standard - it's about Tom McCarthy flat sucking at being the PHILLIES broadcaster.
Grotewold wrote:but what confuses me is so many of you who hate him for being a Mets fan also hate Wheeler, maybe the world's biggest Phillies fan.
TenuredVulture wrote:You can say dumb things and still be hugely popular as a broadcaster. See Phil Rizzutto. At first, I didn't like Sarge at all, but I now think he's great. Not because he has great baseball knowledge, but because he has a great on-air personality. T-Mac doesn't have that.
GMAN
The Loose Cannon
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Jersey Shore
Posts: 36,989
I just had a 10 minute conversation with Rob Brooks. Here is a quick breakdown:
Franske and LA don't want to do TV. On radio they can just do their thing and talk about whatever thwey want. On Tv they have to work more with the producer as opposed to doing things on the fly.
If they would have listened to fans the first 5 years Harry was here, they would have fired him. You have to give an announcer time to grow his roots.
TMac works so hard and he just needs to find his comfort zone. Before he only had 3 innings to get his stuff in, but with 9 he can now slow down a little.
The game today is just called didfferently and Tmac is part of the new generation of announcer. He also said other teams have their TV guys on for all 9 innings, but Harry wanted an inning to do radio and 2 innings to smoke.
He kept hammering away how fans hated Harry, LA and even Whitey when they first started, but the announcers need time to develop a connection with the fans. He also said he gets email for Scott Graham, yet Graham was a Mets fan to.
He also said he does not notice the lack of emotion from TMac when the Phils do something well, nor does he hear excitement when the other team does something well.
The bottomline is TMac is here for a long time and there is nothing we can do about it.
__________________
TenuredVulture wrote:You can say dumb things and still be hugely popular as a broadcaster. See Phil Rizzutto. At first, I didn't like Sarge at all, but I now think he's great. Not because he has great baseball knowledge, but because he has a great on-air personality. T-Mac doesn't have that.
Woody wrote:Yes but what about the fact that he is terrible and annoying and over modulates his voice
Rev_Beezer wrote:By the way, the "T-Mac is here for a long time and there's nothing we can do about it" sentiment just means we have to push harder.
dajafi wrote:Rev_Beezer wrote:By the way, the "T-Mac is here for a long time and there's nothing we can do about it" sentiment just means we have to push harder.
QFT
What they understand is ratings and ad revenue. Honestly, if you want to move this, it might make more sense to approach the advertisers than the FO.
kruker wrote:I can deal with the synch being off between the radio and tv. Let T-Mac talk all he wants, I'm not listening. If you guys want to start writing to the TV advertisers, I'm game.
Franske and LA don't want to do TV. On radio they can just do their thing and talk about whatever thwey want. On Tv they have to work more with the producer as opposed to doing things on the fly.
Rev_Beezer wrote:By the way, the "T-Mac is here for a long time and there's nothing we can do about it" sentiment just means we have to push harder.