Roster Watch

by **seke2** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 08:23:11

so rosterbot is a sellout now? eff him

by **cartersDad26** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 09:32:08

seke2 wrote:so rosterbot is a sellout now? eff him

guess we'll be seeing his name on MLBTR a lot in the coming months.

by **Bill McNeal** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 09:44:22

bleh, seriously, that is awesome. Nice work.

by **Woody** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:01:47

bleh you're the most underrated poster here. for both your technical expertise and your sense of humor. And your avatars are always top notch. I guess I'm trying to ask you out

by **VFB** » Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:23:31

roosterbot is hollywood now 8-)

by **RosterBot** » Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:00:01

Roster changes for Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:00 am
47 Scott Mathieson R/R 6-3 190 02/27/84
Changed to...

by **JFLNYC** » Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:05:00

RosterBot wrote:Roster changes for Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:00 am
47 Scott Mathieson R/R 6-3 190 02/27/84
Changed to...

VFB is right. This is like "Coming Attractions."

by **Bob Loblaw** » Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:58:12

JFLNYC wrote:
RosterBot wrote:Roster changes for Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:00 am
47 Scott Mathieson R/R 6-3 190 02/27/84
Changed to...

VFB is right. This is like "Coming Attractions."

Aren't we a little late for this? I mean, seriously, they weren't worried about losing Mathieson in the Rule 5 draft, were they?

by **LoneStarPhan** » Sun Dec 14, 2008 02:01:59

Bob Loblaw wrote:
JFLNYC wrote:
RosterBot wrote:Roster changes for Sat Dec 13, 2008 9:00 am
47 Scott Mathieson R/R 6-3 190 02/27/84
Changed to...

VFB is right. This is like "Coming Attractions."

Aren't we a little late for this? I mean, seriously, they weren't worried about losing Mathieson in the Rule 5 draft, were they?

Probably working on getting him to take the minor league deal and they did not need the roster spot until now. Anyway, good to keep him in the system.

by **RosterBot** » Mon Dec 15, 2008 18:00:02

Roster changes for Mon Dec 15, 2008 5:00 pm
Changed to...
50 Jamie Moyer L/L 6-0 185 11/18/62

by **cartersDad26** » Mon Dec 15, 2008 19:10:49

RosterBot wrote:Roster changes for Mon Dec 15, 2008 5:00 pm
Changed to...
50 Jamie Moyer L/L 6-0 185 11/18/62

there's our old friend.

by **CFP** » Mon Dec 15, 2008 19:16:18

RosterBot wrote:Roster changes for Mon Dec 15, 2008 5:00 pm
Changed to...
50 Jamie Moyer L/L 6-0 185 11/18/62

I'm gonna cringe when this says Raul Ibanez. Not because we signed him. Because I bought a #28 Werth shirt and if Werth gives up his number to this fool I'm gonna be pissed.

by **RosterBot** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 14:00:02

Roster changes for Tue Dec 16, 2008 1:00 pm
Changed to...
29 Raul Ibanez L/R 6-2 225 06/02/72

by **JFLNYC** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 14:00:49

You're in luck.

by **Bob Loblaw** » Tue Dec 16, 2008 14:40:27

RosterBot wrote:Roster changes for Tue Dec 16, 2008 1:00 pm
Changed to...
29 Raul Ibanez L/R 6-2 225 06/02/72

So much for Kruk's #29 being retired.

:lol:

by **LoneStarPhan** » Wed Dec 17, 2008 00:17:14

I liked Kruk very much.

But hardly number retiring material. 8-)

by **cartersDad26** » Wed Dec 17, 2008 09:40:35

LoneStarPhan wrote:I liked Kruk very much.

But hardly number retiring material.

didn't he also wear #19 for a good while?

by **Bob Loblaw** » Wed Dec 17, 2008 09:45:20

LoneStarPhan wrote:I liked Kruk very much.

But hardly number retiring material.

I was kidding. But it still makes me feel a little odd to see Bruntlett wearing Dyktra's #4 and Jenkins wearing Daulton's #10.

Has anyone worn 14 since Pete?

by **The Marty Show** » Wed Dec 17, 2008 09:52:00

Bob Loblaw wrote:
LoneStarPhan wrote:I liked Kruk very much.

But hardly number retiring material.

I was kidding. But it still makes me feel a little odd to see Bruntlett wearing Dyktra's #4 and Jenkins wearing Daulton's #10.

Has anyone worn 14 since Pete?

I still think of #10 as being Bowa's.

Hand me my walker Ma, I gotta git goin'.

by **JFLNYC** » Wed Dec 17, 2008 10:34:56

Don't feel old. I think of #4 as Gene Mauch.

Archived

Roster Watch