Paul Wellstone!

They killed him by taking remote control of his plane and crashing it.

Bucky wrote:

I think chemtrails are my favorite crackpot theory. Which is what they want me to think. Wheeeeeee

Comtrails are real. My theory is some idiot heard "comtrails" on TV or something, later misconstrued it as "chemtrails" and let his idiot imagination run wild.

I had to google 'comtrails'. didn't find out what it was, but doing so I ran into a "chemtrails" message board.

I have given up all hope for the human race.

Doh! My brain ain't working right today. It's "contrails" with an "n". Vapor trails.

Phan In Phlorida wrote:Doh! My brain ain't working right today. It's "contrails" with an "n". Vapor trails.

More misinformation from the establishment. STOP HIDING THE TRUTH!

says con right there in the name



bold bastards

Chemtrails obsessives - like most obsessives re: anything - are definitely cracked. That said, is it really a huge leap to go from mass medicating your populous a neurotoxin like fluoride to what the essence of the theory proposes? People who had gone down the same pathways about fluoride heretofore endured some similar labeling and just this month a respected peer-review journal confirmed that developmental groups given fluoride were an average of 7 IQ points under the control putting it in league with lead, mercury and arsenic. Link

At this point I just don't think it's intellectually responsible to rule something out of your own believability because some ill people have taken it to extremes. For example, a news item like this published yesterday is readybuilt fodder for extrapolation into broader theories of biotech gaming (RFID chips and the like) that you don't need to buy into to recognize that on a strict moral level the proposed r&d of "a pill that could make someone feel like they were serving a 1,000-year sentence" is both dangerous and abhorrent. Such is the case with chemtrails. Whether it's a real thing or not, the tech is there, and, given some of the unfathomably bizarre discoveries/disclosures in the area of government-sponsored testing/psyops over the past 100 or so years, there wouldn't be much movement of the needle were it all revealed to be as true as sunlight. I'm not versed enough in the origins of chemtrails theory to speak to how its reached this apex of bordering on mass psychogenic illness, but it seems unlikely to have reached this point from a purely fictionalized basis.

the government could also be raping people with drones. just because something could be happening doesn't mean that it is. presenting pictures of jet contrails as evidence that "chemtrails" exist ignores the fact that nobody has proved or even come close to proving that there's whatever coming out of jets, which have always produced a CO2/H2O based byproduct.

I wonder why people don't have the same conspiracy theory about car emissions. maybe because we know those are terrible for people already, but it would be a much more effective way of distributing some kind of mind control substance or whatever batshit insane thing they're saying. i guess because those emissions don't leave clouds in the sky 15,000+ feet above the ground.

when i used to be in the PSU campus weather service, the people i worked with and i would always say that the jet contrails were fucking up our "clear" forecasts because of the jet activity in and out of University Park Airport. when we first heard of the chemtrail conspiracy, we all had a good laugh about it and would go around yelling "CHEMTRAILS" on days that were supposed to be clear, but were partly cloudy because of the mixed contrails.

SK790 wrote:I wonder why people don't have the same conspiracy theory about car emissions. maybe because we know those are terrible for people already, but it would be a much more effective way of distributing some kind of mind control substance or whatever batshit insane thing they're saying. i guess because those emissions don't leave clouds in the sky 15,000+ feet above the ground.

probably also because everyone has a car and feels more in control of the situation, like they would know when this was happening. plus then the level of people that would have to be involved would be much greater

BUILD-A-BEAR IS A FRONT COMPANY FOR THE BILDERBERG GROUP!

OPEN YER EYES SHEEPLE!

Well, I do believe that putting flouride in the water is a fucking monstrosity of a thing to do. Alcoa needed a way to make money off their industrial waste product. Kids in inner cities often suffer from fluorosis and it's long been known to be bad for neurons. On top of that, the thing it's supposed to help, strengthening teeth, has never been shown to be helped by the ingestion of fluoride. Fluoride has been shown to work topicallly, but not by ingesting it. Regardless of how crazy you are, I'd think most people would say that ingesting something that is a known poison doesn't make much sense, especially when the supposed benefit of ingesting that poison hasn't even been shown to exist.

I think this is my one conspiracy theory that I do believe in. I don't believe it's a means of controlling the populace, but I do believe that powerful people found a way to make a bunch of money while simultaneously avoiding a the huge cost of disposing of the chemical safely. There's a reason most of the rest of the world thinks it's insanity.

double post

My favorite thing about mind control and coverup type conspiracies is that the powers that be go just far enough to let people hatch theories on their master plans

Monkeyboy wrote:Well, I do believe that putting flouride in the water is a fucking monstrosity of a thing to do. Alcoa needed a way to make money off their industrial waste product. Kids in inner cities often suffer from fluorosis and it's long been known to be bad for neurons. On top of that, the thing it's supposed to help, strengthening teeth, has never been shown to be helped by the ingestion of fluoride. Fluoride has been shown to work topicallly, but not by ingesting it. Regardless of how crazy you are, I'd think most people would say that ingesting something that is a known poison doesn't make much sense, especially when the supposed benefit of ingesting that poison hasn't even been shown to exist.

I think this is my one conspiracy theory that I do believe in. I don't believe it's a means of controlling the populace, but I do believe that powerful people found a way to make a bunch of money while simultaneously avoiding a the huge cost of disposing of the chemical safely. There's a reason most of the rest of the world thinks it's insanity.

People knowingly ingest tons of poison.

Perhaps, but how many poisons are deliberately added to water supplies?

Lord Jamar from Brand Nubian thinks homosexuality is a population control conspiracy.

my conspiracy: many tcots are either agent provacateurs or Dems trying to discredit the GOP and the tea party.