FTN wrote:
Philly the Kid wrote:And one more - since you had guitarist -- here's Joe Pass doing a sick solo version
Philly the Kid wrote:FTN wrote:
Thanks for posting FTN. I've become a fan of Kurt due to an earlier post of yours!
I'm a bit of a follower of versions of Giant Steps, which in Jazz circles is sort of this bench-mark of your manhood... "can you play Giant Steps" "let's see how he handles Giant Steps" --
The tempo was medium fast, not blazing and it swung ok. The sax guy was struggling to get his lines to connect, the piano solo was stronger but she didn't have the sheer chops to take total control, Kurt got off to a slow start and then heated up with some nice lines and phrasing as it got deeper in. I'll post some examples of Giant Steps that I think show more command ...
I remember once meeting the alto-sax player Bobby Watson at some small show at La Salle in Phila. And we were talking to him and giving him props and he was very humble and kept saying "thanks man thanks man you make me feel good" but then he said "but really, George Coleman - that's the guy man... he can play Giant Steps in all 12 keys!" :- )
....Throughout jazz history, new jazz styles have always been slow bloomers. Then, without warning, they explode, breaking free to become dominant forms. This cycle was as true of bebop as it was of jazz-rock fusion. Now jazz is shifting again after decades of relative stagnancy. It would seem that we're in the "emerging quietly" phase. How long this period lasts is anyone's guess....
...The bigger, unspoken point that I think Payton was making is that black musicians today are increasingly being disenfranchised from jazz. From the perspective of many black jazz artists, white tastes and corporate power have subsumed the genre, compelling musicians to repeatedly record tribute albums and Songbook fare. Many of these artists have had little choice, since many labels have rigid visions of what sells. Musicians have to eat, after all.
drsmooth wrote:Kid, given previous conversations about the presence/absence/relevance of "new" developments in the music, I thought you especially might be interested in this 3/10 item in Marc Myers' Jazzwax blog. He references Nicolas Payton recently making a point of saying he planned to refer to his music as Black American Music rather than jazz (he apparently excised "the j word" from his vocabulary for 90 days, ending last Wednesday). Herewith a quote from Myers' post:....Throughout jazz history, new jazz styles have always been slow bloomers. Then, without warning, they explode, breaking free to become dominant forms. This cycle was as true of bebop as it was of jazz-rock fusion. Now jazz is shifting again after decades of relative stagnancy. It would seem that we're in the "emerging quietly" phase. How long this period lasts is anyone's guess....
...The bigger, unspoken point that I think Payton was making is that black musicians today are increasingly being disenfranchised from jazz. From the perspective of many black jazz artists, white tastes and corporate power have subsumed the genre, compelling musicians to repeatedly record tribute albums and Songbook fare. Many of these artists have had little choice, since many labels have rigid visions of what sells. Musicians have to eat, after all.
Piece also references Myers' 2-part interview with Robert Glasper from earlier in the week, which was also good stuff. As appealing as musician Glasper is, conversationalist Glasper is also a hoot.
The article includes a link to a 40 minute interview with Payton - I've listened to about 3/4 of it, good stuff, I'm not familiar with the interviewer but he does a fine job of drawing Payton out. He also salutes Temple's Terell Stafford at about 30 minutes.