Uncle Milty wrote:Hopefully it's just lagging their Presidential forecast. After narrowing to 67:32 on August 31st it's back to 76:23, just off the 79:21 high.
I can envision split ballots (Biden for pres. but (R) down-ballot) to keep the "radical left" in check.
Uncle Milty wrote:Hopefully it's just lagging their Presidential forecast. After narrowing to 67:32 on August 31st it's back to 76:23, just off the 79:21 high.
I can envision split ballots (Biden for pres. but (R) down-ballot) to keep the "radical left" in check.
MoBettle wrote:Just seems like a more difficult map for democrats in the senate? They’re starting down and they’re gonna lose Alabama and there aren’t a lot of obvious pick ups.
The turn towards the GOP probably just means there was a bad poll in Maine or Iowa or something rather than some sort of national shift out of whack with the presidential race.
Werthless wrote:Uncle Milty wrote:Hopefully it's just lagging their Presidential forecast. After narrowing to 67:32 on August 31st it's back to 76:23, just off the 79:21 high.
I can envision split ballots (Biden for pres. but (R) down-ballot) to keep the "radical left" in check.
Ugh, that's what I did on 2016. I still feel some shame about it. Toomey appears to have few principles.
CalvinBall wrote:Werthless wrote:Uncle Milty wrote:Hopefully it's just lagging their Presidential forecast. After narrowing to 67:32 on August 31st it's back to 76:23, just off the 79:21 high.
I can envision split ballots (Biden for pres. but (R) down-ballot) to keep the "radical left" in check.
Ugh, that's what I did on 2016. I still feel some shame about it. Toomey appears to have few principles.
when doing advocacy work one year we met with a staffer of his in DC. she literally told us that they prefer to decide whether they are voting yes or no on a bill the day before the vote. so i would argue even further that he has no principles.
It's a much better spot for dems than republicans. Dems are only playing defense on really a seat they should never have anyway. Alabama is a republican seat that Doug Jones has because he was going up against a pedophile. The next one up is Michigan which...just isn't turning this year. Everything else is a D pickup opportunity (AZ, NC, ME, IA, MT). AZ is likely and will cancel out AL. NC and ME are D leans right now. IA and ME probably toss ups to Lean R. MT is a stretch but is tough to poll and Bullock is popular.MoBettle wrote:Just seems like a more difficult map for democrats in the senate? They’re starting down and they’re gonna lose Alabama and there aren’t a lot of obvious pick ups.
The turn towards the GOP probably just means there was a bad poll in Maine or Iowa or something rather than some sort of national shift out of whack with the presidential race.
JUburton wrote:It's a much better spot for dems than republicans. Dems are only playing defense on really a seat they should never have anyway. Alabama is a republican seat that Doug Jones has because he was going up against a pedophile. The next one up is Michigan which...just isn't turning this year. Everything else is a D pickup opportunity (AZ, NC, ME, IA, MT). AZ is likely and will cancel out AL. NC and ME are D leans right now. IA and ME probably toss ups to Lean R. MT is a stretch but is tough to poll and Bullock is popular.MoBettle wrote:Just seems like a more difficult map for democrats in the senate? They’re starting down and they’re gonna lose Alabama and there aren’t a lot of obvious pick ups.
The turn towards the GOP probably just means there was a bad poll in Maine or Iowa or something rather than some sort of national shift out of whack with the presidential race.
Ah right I knew I was missing one. But really it's a very good map for 2020. You generally expect these candidates to be buoyed in a presidential year but that's maybe not the case with a president with a shit approval rating.jerseyhoya wrote:JUburton wrote:It's a much better spot for dems than republicans. Dems are only playing defense on really a seat they should never have anyway. Alabama is a republican seat that Doug Jones has because he was going up against a pedophile. The next one up is Michigan which...just isn't turning this year. Everything else is a D pickup opportunity (AZ, NC, ME, IA, MT). AZ is likely and will cancel out AL. NC and ME are D leans right now. IA and ME probably toss ups to Lean R. MT is a stretch but is tough to poll and Bullock is popular.MoBettle wrote:Just seems like a more difficult map for democrats in the senate? They’re starting down and they’re gonna lose Alabama and there aren’t a lot of obvious pick ups.
The turn towards the GOP probably just means there was a bad poll in Maine or Iowa or something rather than some sort of national shift out of whack with the presidential race.
Also CO, which is basically gone
jerseyhoya wrote:Both Georgia seats are 100% in play too
JUburton wrote:It's a much better spot for dems than republicans. Dems are only playing defense on really a seat they should never have anyway. Alabama is a republican seat that Doug Jones has because he was going up against a pedophile. The next one up is Michigan which...just isn't turning this year. Everything else is a D pickup opportunity (AZ, NC, ME, IA, MT). AZ is likely and will cancel out AL. NC and ME are D leans right now. IA and ME probably toss ups to Lean R. MT is a stretch but is tough to poll and Bullock is popular.MoBettle wrote:Just seems like a more difficult map for democrats in the senate? They’re starting down and they’re gonna lose Alabama and there aren’t a lot of obvious pick ups.
The turn towards the GOP probably just means there was a bad poll in Maine or Iowa or something rather than some sort of national shift out of whack with the presidential race.
JUburton wrote:Uncle Milty wrote:Hopefully it's just lagging their Presidential forecast. After narrowing to 67:32 on August 31st it's back to 76:23, just off the 79:21 high.
I can envision split ballots (Biden for pres. but (R) down-ballot) to keep the "radical left" in check.
It's more common than you or I would expect I think. It will be more common this election as people can't vote for Trump but can vote for a more 'normal' republican.
Sad that tommy tuberville who appears to not know that the voting rights act exists, is almost guaranteed a seat.
Wolfgang622 wrote:JUburton wrote:Uncle Milty wrote:Hopefully it's just lagging their Presidential forecast. After narrowing to 67:32 on August 31st it's back to 76:23, just off the 79:21 high.
I can envision split ballots (Biden for pres. but (R) down-ballot) to keep the "radical left" in check.
It's more common than you or I would expect I think. It will be more common this election as people can't vote for Trump but can vote for a more 'normal' republican.
Sad that tommy tuberville who appears to not know that the voting rights act exists, is almost guaranteed a seat.
In 2016, besides promising me Hilary would win PA, 538 also promised me McGinty would beat Toomey.
I'm still aggravated.
Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?
thephan wrote:saw earlier that the4re is another sexual assault claim on Trump. No big deal, right, just another day.