“To now change the rules in the middle of the game to accommodate Mike Bloomberg, who is trying to buy his way into the Democratic nomination, is wrong. That’s the definition of a rigged system,” said Jeff Weaver, a senior adviser to Sanders’ campaign.

Bucky wrote:no offense taken, so long as you vote for him if he gets the nod

pacino wrote:Bernie's correct here.

Changing the rules for one candidate is absurd. They didn't do it for all the others, but they did it for the one that donated 300k to them.

"The House chose to send articles of impeachment that are rushed and flawed," Murkowski explained. "I have come to the conclusion that there will be no fair trial in the Senate. I don't believe the continuation of this process will change anything. It is sad for me to admit that, as an institution, the Congress has failed. It has also become clear some of my colleagues intend to further politicize this process, and drag the Supreme Court into the fray. ... We have already degraded this institution for partisan political benefit, and I will not enable those who wish to pull down another."

Grotewold wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:our only hope

https://twitter.com/JordanUhl/status/12 ... 3554709506

damn

traderdave wrote:

pacino wrote:Bernie's correct here.

Changing the rules for one candidate is absurd. They didn't do it for all the others, but they did it for the one that donated 300k to them.

This. All changing the rules does is make Bloomberg look like the spoiled rich kid. Yeah, can't vote to line up to vote for him.

thephan wrote:

"The House chose to send articles of impeachment that are rushed and flawed," Murkowski explained. "I have come to the conclusion that there will be no fair trial in the Senate. I don't believe the continuation of this process will change anything. It is sad for me to admit that, as an institution, the Congress has failed. It has also become clear some of my colleagues intend to further politicize this process, and drag the Supreme Court into the fray. ... We have already degraded this institution for partisan political benefit, and I will not enable those who wish to pull down another."

Just stop talking nonsense

pacino wrote:Bernie's correct here.

Changing the rules for one candidate is absurd. They didn't do it for all the others, but they did it for the one that donated 300k to them.

"The River of Blood" is a monument located on a golf course on Lowes Island, Virginia owned by President Donald Trump. A plaque signed with Trump's name states that the monument marks the place of numerous deaths in the American Civil War, although no listed battle nor publicly disclosed event with any recorded casualties took place at the site.

momadance wrote:Hope the next Democrat President goes scorched #$!&@ earth. Do whatever you want.

Trent Steele wrote:Fuck Bernie.

Werthless wrote:

pacino wrote:Bernie's correct here.

Changing the rules for one candidate is absurd. They didn't do it for all the others, but they did it for the one that donated 300k to them.

That rule is/was dumb. The purpose of the rules are to ensure that only candidates with a chance to win should participate in the debates. The rules shouldn't keep out late entrants who have polling support. If Michelle Obama entered the race and was polling at 20%, she should be in the next debate.

CalvinBall wrote:Lol Bloomberg is going to look like a fool. It's probably a negative for him to be invited.

Werthless wrote:

pacino wrote:Bernie's correct here.

Changing the rules for one candidate is absurd. They didn't do it for all the others, but they did it for the one that donated 300k to them.

That rule is/was dumb. The purpose of the rules are to ensure that only candidates with a chance to win should participate in the debates. The rules shouldn't keep out late entrants who have polling support. If Michelle Obama entered the race and was polling at 20%, she should be in the next debate.