heyeaglefn wrote:Debates seem pretty outdated, you'd think they would come up with a better format, especially when you have so many people.
Werthless wrote:Do political scientists have a solution to the problem of extreme gerrymandering, to the extent they see it as a problem?
I have a hard time wrapping my head around the argument that the federal courts do not have an interest in how Congressional maps can be drawn, where free and fair elections and access is clearly under the umbrella of federal oversight.
Kyle Kondik @kkondik
More Kyle Kondik Retweeted Nathan I Winston
is it possible to say that gerrymandering is both a hugely important and also a hugely overrated problem in politics? I freely admit to oscillating between those positions and holding both positions in my head at the same time.
TenuredVulture wrote:Racial gerrrymandering helps republicans.
The case has drawn criticism from abortion rights groups
swishnicholson wrote:The case has drawn criticism from abortion rights groups
If that's all it draws criticism from, we really are fucked
swishnicholson wrote:The case has drawn criticism from abortion rights groups
If that's all it draws criticism from, we really are fucked
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:"Anyway, my time is up." - literally a quote from Joe Biden
Werthless wrote:swishnicholson wrote:The case has drawn criticism from abortion rights groups
If that's all it draws criticism from, we really are fucked
Lawyers, man. I can't imagine being the prosecutor in this.
That said, I am interested to hear what the grand jury was told.