JUburton wrote:

Warszawa wrote:I’m hearing increasing talk that there will not be a calm transfer of power if trump loses in 2020, especially if he knows he will be arrested the moment he walks out the door

I've seen this but do not understand it. The secret service will protect the new president from a secure location. His detail would surely stand down if he had to be removed from the premises. The football and whatever other president specific things would be taken from him.

And also he is a huge fucking baby and has never actually had a conflict in his life. He talks tough and has no problem demeaning superiors but he's such a wimp that despite his trademark phrase being 'you're fired' he does it by tweet or has other people do it for him. I cannot see this giant man baby actually having a conflict on this level.

06hawkalum wrote:

JUburton wrote:

Warszawa wrote:I’m hearing increasing talk that there will not be a calm transfer of power if trump loses in 2020, especially if he knows he will be arrested the moment he walks out the door

I've seen this but do not understand it. The secret service will protect the new president from a secure location. His detail would surely stand down if he had to be removed from the premises. The football and whatever other president specific things would be taken from him.

And also he is a huge fucking baby and has never actually had a conflict in his life. He talks tough and has no problem demeaning superiors but he's such a wimp that despite his trademark phrase being 'you're fired' he does it by tweet or has other people do it for him. I cannot see this giant man baby actually having a conflict on this level.

Yep, the Secret Service and United States military's loyalty is to the new POTUS, not Dump.

That being said, it would set an awful precedent.

JUburton wrote:

06hawkalum wrote:

JUburton wrote:

Warszawa wrote:I’m hearing increasing talk that there will not be a calm transfer of power if trump loses in 2020, especially if he knows he will be arrested the moment he walks out the door

I've seen this but do not understand it. The secret service will protect the new president from a secure location. His detail would surely stand down if he had to be removed from the premises. The football and whatever other president specific things would be taken from him.

And also he is a huge fucking baby and has never actually had a conflict in his life. He talks tough and has no problem demeaning superiors but he's such a wimp that despite his trademark phrase being 'you're fired' he does it by tweet or has other people do it for him. I cannot see this giant man baby actually having a conflict on this level.

Yep, the Secret Service and United States military's loyalty is to the new POTUS, not Dump.

That being said, it would set an awful precedent.

*an awful president

CalvinBall wrote:only 20k jobs added in feb

Phred wrote:I think that there strategy would be to call the election results into question and invalidate them so he stays president.

So much voter fraud!

momadance wrote:

ReadingPhilly wrote:

momadance wrote:"We appreciate it very much, Tim Apple" ... What a dipshit.

https://twitter.com/sokane1/status/1103421841505505280

https://twitter.com/delaneywilliams/sta ... 8672089088

CalvinBall wrote:only 20k jobs added in feb

Phred wrote:I think that there strategy would be to call the election results into question and invalidate them so he stays president.

So much voter fraud!

JUburton wrote:

Phred wrote:I think that there strategy would be to call the election results into question and invalidate them so he stays president.

So much voter fraud!

It just won't work. Bush v Gore was one thing but assuming that situation doesn't happen again, SCOTUS isn't going to buy this shit.

JFLNYC wrote:

JUburton wrote:

Phred wrote:I think that there strategy would be to call the election results into question and invalidate them so he stays president.

So much voter fraud!

It just won't work. Bush v Gore was one thing but assuming that situation doesn't happen again, SCOTUS isn't going to buy this shit.

Assuming what doesn't happen again? A Republican-majority SCOTUS cooking up a ridiculous legal theory to keep a Dem out of the WH? Why in the world would we think that's less likely now than it was then?

CalvinBall wrote:trump watched the super bowl with the owner of the spa that kraft solicited the human trafficked girls at. the owner was also at the inaugural. there are a number of photos of the owner and trump and family together.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politi ... 86429.html

JUburton wrote:

Warszawa wrote:I’m hearing increasing talk that there will not be a calm transfer of power if trump loses in 2020, especially if he knows he will be arrested the moment he walks out the door

I've seen this but do not understand it. The secret service will protect the new president from a secure location. His detail would surely stand down if he had to be removed from the premises. The football and whatever other president specific things would be taken from him.

And also he is a huge fucking baby and has never actually had a conflict in his life. He talks tough and has no problem demeaning superiors but he's such a wimp that despite his trademark phrase being 'you're fired' he does it by tweet or has other people do it for him. I cannot see this giant man baby actually having a conflict on this level.

JFLNYC wrote:

Phred wrote:I think that there strategy would be to call the election results into question and invalidate them so he stays president.

So much voter fraud!

Exactly. It would never get to the point of a new President being inaugurated or to the point where Trump is barricaded behind his desk in the Oval Office. Trump will get a couple of Republican controlled states to claim there was voter fraud (I wouldn't be surprised if he really trolled us and blamed the Russians) so that those states' results can't be certified to the Electoral College and, therefore, the election as a whole can't be certified. Under Electoral College rules it would end up before a joint session of Congress with the Vice President (that's right, Pence) presiding as president of the Senate.

If you don't think Trump is already gaming this out and laying the groundwork with his attacks on the Dems, you are kidding yourself.

Werthless wrote:

JFLNYC wrote:

Phred wrote:I think that there strategy would be to call the election results into question and invalidate them so he stays president.

So much voter fraud!

Exactly. It would never get to the point of a new President being inaugurated or to the point where Trump is barricaded behind his desk in the Oval Office. Trump will get a couple of Republican controlled states to claim there was voter fraud (I wouldn't be surprised if he really trolled us and blamed the Russians) so that those states' results can't be certified to the Electoral College and, therefore, the election as a whole can't be certified. Under Electoral College rules it would end up before a joint session of Congress with the Vice President (that's right, Pence) presiding as president of the Senate.

If you don't think Trump is already gaming this out and laying the groundwork with his attacks on the Dems, you are kidding yourself.

He's too incompetent to engineer something like this. Who's he going to ask to coordinate this, Guiliani?

Grotewold wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:trump watched the super bowl with the owner of the spa that kraft solicited the human trafficked girls at. the owner was also at the inaugural. there are a number of photos of the owner and trump and family together.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politi ... 86429.html

The best people

CalvinBall wrote:Democrats are insanely inept at handling controversial things. Can't believe Omar is still a story.