If we had a Purge-like night, would i spend the valuable time it would take to end Lou Dobbs? Tough call. Definitely better options, but he is sooooo deserving. I might just have to hope that he would be on the list for others. I figure we are no more than 36 months from this happening anyway. Need to stay in decent shape.

pacino wrote:a map from the NY Times of every precinct in the country and how they voted

also, takeaways showing vestiges of segregation, college towns, migration, etc

My suburbia precinct went 68% Clinton, 4% third party. More liberal than I would have guessed.

My precinct went 53% trump

Werthless wrote:

pacino wrote:a map from the NY Times of every precinct in the country and how they voted

also, takeaways showing vestiges of segregation, college towns, migration, etc

My suburbia precinct went 68% Clinton, 4% third party. More liberal than I would have guessed.

idk, i see lots of "hate has no home here" signs in our hood

Werthless wrote:

pacino wrote:a map from the NY Times of every precinct in the country and how they voted

also, takeaways showing vestiges of segregation, college towns, migration, etc

My suburbia precinct went 68% Clinton, 4% third party. More liberal than I would have guessed.

52/41 Trump/Clinton , moving to 74 Clinton, 22 Trump

i'm moving to the 'bubble', so much as one of the poorest cities in the country surrounded by middle-class suburbs can be a bubble

wow, the historical marker of rich Republicanism in Berks (Wyomissing) went 48/48; 'new money' places where large developments with mcmansions went Trump. so weird

my wife's parents' area went 70/25 Trump

my parents' area went 52/42 Trump

The Dude wrote:

Werthless wrote:

pacino wrote:a map from the NY Times of every precinct in the country and how they voted

also, takeaways showing vestiges of segregation, college towns, migration, etc

My suburbia precinct went 68% Clinton, 4% third party. More liberal than I would have guessed.

idk, i see lots of "hate has no home here" signs in our hood

< fear does not exist in this dojo

Clinton 60%, around me is 50/50 leaning Trump. Doylestown is the last stop before a lot of rural areas.

Clinton won my precinct 89-4 & I live a 37 minute drive without traffic from the nearest Trump precinct #draintheswamp

“Colluding about Russians ― I’m not sure that’s even a crime,” Giuliani told CNN’s Alisyn Camerota. “The hacking is the crime. The president didn’t hack.”

Jay Sekulow, another member of Trump’s legal team, repeated the claim during an appearance Tuesday on “Fox & Friends.”

″There’s not any evidence of collusion here involving our client and the Russians,” Sekulow said. “But collusion isn’t a crime.”

Chris Christie on ABC’s “This Week” that “collusion is not a crime.”

@realDonaldTrump

Collusion is not a crime, but that doesn’t matter because there was No Collusion (except by Crooked Hillary and the Democrats)!

Push all those chips to the center of the table. Collusion, as a word, is not a crime, but I think that when linked to other words and actions it becomes criminal.

If it's what they're indicating it is I love it

'Collusion' isn't a crime because it's simply a word used by cable news in place of all the actual crimes

look, doing crimes isn't a crime

Current precinct: 71% Trump. And about 9% voted 3rd party here. Not sure if that's high or not. Not too far to the nearest Clinton precinct though. (Segregation is still a thing.) Grew up in a precinct where Trump did better than Hillary (48-45%).

51/45 Clinton. Had no inkling it was even that close. I give up

That's sort of a conservative area of the city though right?

nah, inner ring suburb (Whitemarsh Township)

Bucky wrote:nah, inner ring suburb (Whitemarsh Township)

hoity toity

Bucky wrote:nah, inner ring suburb (Whitemarsh Township)

it's an upper-middle class suburb with 90% white people; it's basically exactly what Trump's base of support is. That it went Clinton is interesting.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/31/us/p ... terms.html

big news

The Crimson Cyclone wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/31/us/politics/facebook-political-campaign-midterms.html

big news

WASHINGTON — Facebook is preparing to announce that it has identified a coordinated political influence campaign, with dozens of inauthentic accounts and pages that are believed to be engaging in political activity ahead of November’s midterm elections, according to three people briefed on the matter.

for the bolded part it could also describe their partnership with FOX News