Rococo4 wrote:Wonder what the attackers religion was ? Lutheran? J catholic ?
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Captain Obvious wrote:Trump's got the solution. Just give him his travel ban and we're all safe.
Donald J. TrumpVerified account @realDonaldTrump 21m21 minutes ago
We need to be smart, vigilant and tough. We need the courts to give us back our rights. We need the Travel Ban as an extra level of safety!
pacino wrote:Rococo4 wrote:Wonder what the attackers religion was ? Lutheran? J catholic ?
You should read about the history of terrorism in the UK. It'd be loaded with the IRA.
etched Chaos wrote:He can go #$!&@ himself, he doesn't even bother to offer support for an 'ally' in the midst of terrorist attacks. No, he has to harp on about his #$!&@ travel ban, #$!&@ YOU TRUMP, #$!&@ YOU AND YOUR ORANGE #$!&@ ASS!!
Rococo4 wrote:etched Chaos wrote:He can go #$!&@ himself, he doesn't even bother to offer support for an 'ally' in the midst of terrorist attacks. No, he has to harp on about his #$!&@ travel ban, #$!&@ YOU TRUMP, #$!&@ YOU AND YOUR ORANGE #$!&@ ASS!!
He did
Should I really feel bad for people so stupid they actually paid money to attend a place called Trump University? It probably shows that deep down, I’m a bad person, but in the end, I just don’t care about dopes who laid out thousands to sit in some conference room at the Holiday Inn and hear some sleaze bag talk about making money in real estate.
Rococo4 wrote:Yeah I don't doubt that. But i was asking about tonight.pacino wrote:Rococo4 wrote:Wonder what the attackers religion was ? Lutheran? J catholic ?
You should read about the history of terrorism in the UK. It'd be loaded with the IRA.
06hawkalum wrote:Rococo4 wrote:Yeah I don't doubt that. But i was asking about tonight.pacino wrote:Rococo4 wrote:Wonder what the attackers religion was ? Lutheran? J catholic ?
You should read about the history of terrorism in the UK. It'd be loaded with the IRA.
Why did it take so long for you to come out of the woodwork? I thought we only had two hardcore Trumpies on the board.
Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?
etched Chaos wrote:Rococo4 wrote:etched Chaos wrote:He can go #$!&@ himself, he doesn't even bother to offer support for an 'ally' in the midst of terrorist attacks. No, he has to harp on about his #$!&@ travel ban, #$!&@ YOU TRUMP, #$!&@ YOU AND YOUR ORANGE #$!&@ ASS!!
He did
I saw the travel ban BS first, then posted.
He can still go #$!&@ himself.
After taking criticism online for trying to use the attack to advance a policy goal that is now under review in the courts, he sent a follow-up tweet minutes later: “Whatever the United States can do to help out in London and the U. K., we will be there — WE ARE WITH YOU. GOD BLESS!”
Key findings include:
Conservative foundations have bank-rolled denial. The largest and most consistent funders of organizations orchestrating climate change denial are a number of well-known conservative foundations, such as the Searle Freedom Trust, the John William Pope Foundation, the Howard Charitable Foundation and the Sarah Scaife Foundation. These foundations promote ultra-free-market ideas in many realms.
Koch and ExxonMobil have recently pulled back from publicly visible funding. From 2003 to 2007, the Koch Affiliated Foundations and the ExxonMobil Foundation were heavily involved in funding climate-change denial organizations. But since 2008, they are no longer making publicly traceable contributions.
Funding has shifted to pass through untraceable sources. Coinciding with the decline in traceable funding, the amount of funding given to denial organizations by the Donors Trust has risen dramatically. Donors Trust is a donor-directed foundation whose funders cannot be traced. This one foundation now provides about 25% of all traceable foundation funding used by organizations engaged in promoting systematic denial of climate change.
Most funding for denial efforts is untraceable. Despite extensive data compilation and analyses, only a fraction of the hundreds of millions in contributions to climate change denying organizations can be specifically accounted for from public records. Approximately 75% of the income of these organizations comes from unidentifiable sources.