Youseff wrote:I don't get the extra E.

Brantt wrote:

Luzinski's Gut wrote:I didn't expect you to be this naïve.

Why?

Haven't you read anything he's written in the last 18 months?

This is par for the course.

Brantt wrote:

pacino wrote:

Brantt wrote:

Luzinski's Gut wrote:I didn't expect you to be this naïve.

Why?

Haven't you read anything he's written in the last 18 months?

This is par for the course.

Perhaps you should be more concerned with the #$!&@ hires Trump is making than with a poster on a message board.


edit: oh, and LOL

Here's a tip for a more healthy life..........only worry about what you can control.

It will help you be more productive.

Brantt wrote:Popcorn fart.

Save the faux outrage for something real.

Brantt wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:

Brantt wrote:Popcorn fart.

Save the faux outrage for something real.

just really curious how you are outraged over emails but not this. do you really believe trump did not order this? us intelligence has been able to confirm some of the claims of the leaked dossier.

when will you be outraged? when will it be real for you?

What specifically are you talking about?

What did Trump order? His future NSA talking with other countries during the transition? That is standard operating procedure for every incoming administration and has been done since the beginning of time. There's a reason the Logan Act has never been observed. They would be neglecting their duties if they were not doing that.

According to the Washington Post, the FBI reviewed the transcript of the call Flynn had and there was nothing illicit or confidential in the call. Actually, I believe the FBI announced there was no wrongdoing by Flynn in the call based on the transcript. The only issue I see here is Flynn lying to Pence and making him look like a fool a week later. That's a fireable offense and he was held accountable and paid the price.

In terms of the dossier, your comment above is anything ranging from intellectually dishonest to completely false.

None of the newly learned information relates to the salacious allegations in the dossier. Rather it relates to conversations between foreign nationals. The dossier details about a dozen conversations between senior Russian officials and other Russian individuals. Sources would not confirm which specific conversations were intercepted or the content of those discussions due to the classified nature of US intelligence collection programs.

But the intercepts do confirm that some of the conversations described in the dossier took place between the same individuals on the same days and from the same locations as detailed in the dossier, according to the officials. CNN has not confirmed whether any content relates to then-candidate Trump.

Nothing said about Trump in the dossier was confirmed. Not a word. This is craziness. It's crying wolf over and over and over and over again. It's making things up out of thin air. To answer your question, I will be outraged if Trump doesn't follow through on what he said he was going to do. Or more likely, I will be outraged when the Republican Congress sits on their ass and doesn't push his agenda through.

The only outrageous behavior I've seen since January 20th is from the sore-loser Democrats in Congress and the media.

td11 wrote:@cimarcos
Rep. Labrador (R-ID): "If we’re just going to replace Obamacare with Obamacare-lite..were we just against it because it was proposed by Ds?"

lol

CFP wrote:Jesus. Labrador is reminding me of the cat reading the newspaper meme

"Maybe I should become a Democrat"

Unlike many Republicans, Labrador did not see the shutdown as a permanent stain on the Party. He grabbed one of two large poster-board polling charts leaning against his desk; it was titled “Before /After 2013 Shutdown” and showed the Republican Party’s approval ratings quickly recovering. “Within a couple of months, people forgot what happened,” he said. “So our favorables went back up, and our unfavorables went back down.” Boehner’s lesson was meant to make the rebellious members listen; instead, they learned that they didn’t need to.

Labrador then pointed to another chart, which showed that the G.O.P.’s favorable ratings this year dropped from forty-one per cent, in January, to thirty-two per cent, in July. “This is what happens when we do nothing,” he said. “This is the new G.O.P. majority in 2015, when we stand for nothing.” The problem, in his view, was that the Party was “governing,” he said, adding air quotes to the word. “If people just want to ‘govern,’ which means bringing more government, they’re always going to choose the Democrat.”

CFP wrote:Jesus. Labrador is reminding me of the cat reading the newspaper meme

"Maybe I should become a Democrat"

CFP wrote:Jesus. Labrador is reminding me of the cat reading the newspaper meme

"Maybe I should become a Democrat"

td11 wrote:@jamiedupree
House Ways & Means Committee voted 23-15 today against a plan from Democrats to force review of Trump tax returns

@nkulw
Ah


Kellyanne Conway Claims She Doesn’t Know Who Retweeted A White Nationalist From Her Twitter Account

@katieglueck
"F.B.I. agents interviewed Flynn when he was national security adviser in the first days of Trump administration" https://nyti.ms/2lMABtL

@tobyharnden
Lying to the FBI is what led to criminal convictions for Scooter Libby and Gen James Cartwright

td11 wrote:

miss me yet?

td11 wrote:

miss me yet?