Woody wrote:Did the Walton family support Trump?
Pretty sure they backed Clinton
Woody wrote:Did the Walton family support Trump?
Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?
Houshphandzadeh wrote:75% less regulations, 35% border tax
what a world
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Monkeyboy wrote:Brantt wrote:drsmooth wrote:Brantt wrote:
Union vote for this election was 51/43. Trump has a huge opportunity with unions that a Republican (well, Trump's not really a Republican) hasn't had in decades.
When drumpf doesn't deliver meaningful infrastructure dough - because congressional Rs will either have to completely abandon their deficit hypocricy OR block tax cuts to approve more than token projects -it seems likely that union voters, like non-union voters, will blame drumpf, or congressional Rs, or both. And their reaction to any schemes to "privatize" infrastructure projects may be even stronger.
The Republicans will get in line and do exactly what Trump tells them to............just like Little Marco yesterday.
agreed, but mindless devotion isn't a good thing. I'm sure you would at least agree with that
CalvinBall wrote:trump to nominate a judge next week.
republicans are upset dems have asked for delays on cabinet picks like devos who demonstrated she knows very little about education.
republicans committed a pretty grave injustice to the constitution by not even taking a hearing on pres. obama's pick for nearly a year so donald trump, a man who probably doesn't know how many amendments there are in the constitution, could make the pick instead bc the people need to have a voice.
slugsrbad wrote:52 swing districts, need to win 80% of them. It's not impossible, but we will need a continuation of Saturday going forward.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Houshphandzadeh wrote:td11 wrote:Houshphandzadeh wrote:pretty confident bunch in here
??
was referring to doc and hawk's feeling that this will work out gloriously for Dems in 18
CalvinBall wrote:trump to nominate a judge next week.
Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Youseff wrote:slugsrbad wrote:52 swing districts, need to win 80% of them. It's not impossible, but we will need a continuation of Saturday going forward.
I think there's some reason to be optimistic, but plenty of reason to be pessimistic. the Brantt's of the world aren't going to get smarter in 2 years. hopefully the Dems take a Howard Dean 50 State Plan, and in every leftish county. Obama gets a lot of crap for all the lost seats all around the country, and he deserves some blame, but DWS should probably be put in a gulag.
td11 wrote:Youseff wrote:slugsrbad wrote:52 swing districts, need to win 80% of them. It's not impossible, but we will need a continuation of Saturday going forward.
I think there's some reason to be optimistic, but plenty of reason to be pessimistic. the Brantt's of the world aren't going to get smarter in 2 years. hopefully the Dems take a Howard Dean 50 State Plan, and in every leftish county. Obama gets a lot of crap for all the lost seats all around the country, and he deserves some blame, but DWS should probably be put in a gulag.
DWS was a disaster, no doubt. it's funny that Rs are the ones who rode the populist wave into the white house, when on all the issues (health care, unions, wages, etc) the populist would probably agree with left-leaning policies more
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.