jamiethekiller wrote:Ball would be so sick

i know you like him and he gets kind of shit on more than he probably should but
-doesn't fit an off-ball role
-strengths duplicate simmons in many ways
-can't really defend that well
-mostly a one-level scorer with serious limitations of developing
-pretty inefficient on O
-LAVAR

not seeing it

laf837 wrote:

gpicaro wrote:Correct me if I’m wrong, but, assuming we keep #10, in order to have enough room for Lebron we need to get rid of Holmes, Bayless, and #26 right?

I ask because it seems we’d more desperately need a top backup C/PF at #10 if that’s the case instead of the options we have been looking at.

Nerlens!

ship has sailed / we still have the same crew he hates

gr wrote:

laf837 wrote:

gpicaro wrote:Correct me if I’m wrong, but, assuming we keep #10, in order to have enough room for Lebron we need to get rid of Holmes, Bayless, and #26 right?

I ask because it seems we’d more desperately need a top backup C/PF at #10 if that’s the case instead of the options we have been looking at.

Nerlens!

ship has sailed / we still have the same crew he hates

Didn't they go to dinner with him when they were in Dallas? I don't think he hated anyone he just thought he was a starter.

downplaying the development of Fultz is just a defense mechanism for tempered expectations so that when he blows you out of the water next season, you can sit back and count your bonuses.

Team Kelle all the way

MoBettle wrote:

gr wrote:

laf837 wrote:

gpicaro wrote:Correct me if I’m wrong, but, assuming we keep #10, in order to have enough room for Lebron we need to get rid of Holmes, Bayless, and #26 right?

I ask because it seems we’d more desperately need a top backup C/PF at #10 if that’s the case instead of the options we have been looking at.

Nerlens!

ship has sailed / we still have the same crew he hates

Didn't they go to dinner with him when they were in Dallas? I don't think he hated anyone he just thought he was a starter.

I don't remember seeing that, but if he wants to bring his all-star level defense back for 15-20 mins a night on a prove it one-year deal, sure!

gr wrote:

MoBettle wrote:

gr wrote:

laf837 wrote:

gpicaro wrote:Correct me if I’m wrong, but, assuming we keep #10, in order to have enough room for Lebron we need to get rid of Holmes, Bayless, and #26 right?

I ask because it seems we’d more desperately need a top backup C/PF at #10 if that’s the case instead of the options we have been looking at.

Nerlens!

ship has sailed / we still have the same crew he hates

Didn't they go to dinner with him when they were in Dallas? I don't think he hated anyone he just thought he was a starter.

i don't I don't remember seeing that, but if he wants to bring his all-star level defense back for 15-20 mins a night on a prove it one-year deal, sure!

and i don't remember seeing him hating the crew.

gr wrote:

jamiethekiller wrote:Ball would be so sick

i know you like him and he gets kind of shit on more than he probably should but
-doesn't fit an off-ball role
-strengths duplicate simmons in many ways
-can't really defend that well
-mostly a one-level scorer with serious limitations of developing
-pretty inefficient on O
-LAVAR

not seeing it

Almost every burger dot is wrong. Thanks for playing.

burger dot

stevemc wrote:Fultz comeback player of the year award next season is going to be so sweet.

You can't come back if you were never there.

Idk if this makes me feel better or worse but I think Porzingis will be better than Tatum and Fultz even with a wack jumper is better than Okafor.

Fultz will average 15 next year

*instagram quotes per week

MoBettle wrote:Idk if this makes me feel better or worse but I think Porzingis will be better than Tatum and Fultz even with a wack jumper is better than Okafor.

I don't feel bad about Porzingis at all, tbh. There was just no way the Sixers could have chosen him after the two previous drafts, all the scrutiny they were under, and having just announced Embiid would miss another year. Really bad spot from which they made the worst move.

And honestly the Tatum/Fultz thing has gone laughably beyond reasonable expectation.

Get this summer right and ride

jamiethekiller wrote:

gr wrote:

jamiethekiller wrote:Ball would be so sick

i know you like him and he gets kind of #$!&@ on more than he probably should but
-doesn't fit an off-ball role
-strengths duplicate simmons in many ways
-can't really defend that well
-mostly a one-level scorer with serious limitations of developing
-pretty inefficient on O
-LAVAR

not seeing it

Almost every burger dot is wrong. Thanks for playing.

well then walk me through it professor!

Porzingis is never going to hold up over the long term imo. Just feel like he is always going to be battling injuries.

This year was an awesome year to be a Sixers fan. Next year will be even better.

Hinkie is doing some analytics consulting with the Broncos.

That embiid dunking on some dope video is from a park one block from my house. I should have been out hooping today

I’m all in on the big ragu at 10

Woody wrote:Fultz will average 15 next year

Minutes per game? Optimistic!