Squire wrote:So I presume that the Lakers Rep will not be there
joe table wrote:Why is there all this kawhi 6ers content on ESPN? Just clickbait or was there some actual report
joe table wrote:Why is there all this kawhi 6ers content on ESPN? Just clickbait or was there some actual report
MoBettle wrote:Feel like you'd be hard pressed to find someone willing to go into the level of detail they go into on a free daily NBA podcast without them being somewhat of a goober. I appreciate them.
After taking a break from all NBA podcasts for a bit, I went back and listened to their wing free agency rankings. Biggest takeaway is there really is a huge drop off after George and James. Redick might be the 3rd best guy depending on how you feel about KCP and Bradley.
Monkeyboy wrote:so what am I supposed to be rooting for to happen? #1 pick or would that then go somewhere else?
joe table wrote:MoBettle wrote:Feel like you'd be hard pressed to find someone willing to go into the level of detail they go into on a free daily NBA podcast without them being somewhat of a goober. I appreciate them.
After taking a break from all NBA podcasts for a bit, I went back and listened to their wing free agency rankings. Biggest takeaway is there really is a huge drop off after George and James. Redick might be the 3rd best guy depending on how you feel about KCP and Bradley.
Danny Green?
joe table wrote:MoBettle wrote:Feel like you'd be hard pressed to find someone willing to go into the level of detail they go into on a free daily NBA podcast without them being somewhat of a goober. I appreciate them.
After taking a break from all NBA podcasts for a bit, I went back and listened to their wing free agency rankings. Biggest takeaway is there really is a huge drop off after George and James. Redick might be the 3rd best guy depending on how you feel about KCP and Bradley.
Danny Green?
MoBettle wrote:Monkeyboy wrote:so what am I supposed to be rooting for to happen? #1 pick or would that then go somewhere else?
We keep 1 or 10+, Boston gets 2 or 3.
If Boston gets the pick, then we have the kings pick next year unencumbered. If we keep the pick, Boston gets the better pick of ours or the Kings next year unless it's #1.
I don't think there's necessarily a "right" answer of what to root for. Getting #1 would be undoubtably sweet though.
joe table wrote:Cov - fultz - Lakers pick - their choice of furk/holmes/TLC (plus whatever else needed to match salary). Enough for sprus?
Doll Is Mine wrote:Who's less tradeable right now? Markelle Fultz or Lonzo Ball?
Girooski wrote:joe table wrote:Cov - fultz - Lakers pick - their choice of furk/holmes/TLC (plus whatever else needed to match salary). Enough for sprus?
Am I the only one that thinks a broke fultz isn’t as valuable as everyone thinks? I think you are going to have to add Dario to that deal.