heyeaglefn wrote:I don't think the strike zone should be the same for someone who is 10 inches taller than another player. I think the technology could handle it.
phatj wrote:heyeaglefn wrote:I don't think the strike zone should be the same for someone who is 10 inches taller than another player. I think the technology could handle it.
I dunno, the width stays the same though taller players generally have longer reach.
Now that I think of it though, a standardized strike zone might ultimately result in a "natural" selection for players within a narrower range of height. If the standardized strike zone is larger than what smaller players get today, they would have a hard time covering it, and if it is lower than what taller players get today, they would have a really hard time with low strikes.
BigEd76 wrote:Just a bunch of relievers and AAA call-ups starting for them until the injured guys get back ... and they still beat the Yankees 2 outta 3 this week
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:also, why is matt chapman so high
pacino wrote:tbf, some of that may be radar gun adjustments
ek wrote:what did Gooden throw
smitty wrote:pacino wrote:tbf, some of that may be radar gun adjustments
The radar guns improved over the years. Further, now they measure pitch speed from out of the hand instead of when it crossed the plate. This added 3-4 mph to a pitcher's fastball.
JUGS gun info.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/JUGS_gun
ek wrote:what did Gooden throw
ek wrote:what did Gooden throw
Baseball's biggest problem isn't strikeouts or analytics or pace of play.
It's curmudgeonly broadcasters that piss on the current game and players. You know what's a bad way to sell a product to young fans? Screaming "get off my lawn!" every night.