threecount wrote:Gretchen Carlson out at Fox News...files suit after claiming she was fired after refusing to sleep with Roger Ailes![]()
http://www.thewrap.com/fox-news-gretche ... arassment/
if true, does that mean Megyn Kelly did sleep with him?
threecount wrote:Gretchen Carlson out at Fox News...files suit after claiming she was fired after refusing to sleep with Roger Ailes![]()
http://www.thewrap.com/fox-news-gretche ... arassment/
FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.
Scott WalkerVerified account
@ScottWalker
Last August, I said I'd support the GOP nominee. It's now clear who the RNC delegates will vote to nominate. And he is better than she is.
The Crimson Cyclone wrote:threecount wrote:Gretchen Carlson out at Fox News...files suit after claiming she was fired after refusing to sleep with Roger Ailes![]()
http://www.thewrap.com/fox-news-gretche ... arassment/
if true, does that mean Megyn Kelly did sleep with him?
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
CalvinBall wrote:and down goes another one of JH's heroesScott WalkerVerified account
@ScottWalker
Last August, I said I'd support the GOP nominee. It's now clear who the RNC delegates will vote to nominate. And he is better than she is.
threecount wrote:Gretchen Carlson out at Fox News...files suit after claiming she was fired after refusing to sleep with Roger Ailes![]()
http://www.thewrap.com/fox-news-gretche ... arassment/
FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.
FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.
FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.
FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.
JFLNYC wrote:Has Christie withdrawn?
MoBettle wrote:drsmooth wrote:MoBettle wrote:
My point is that it's just weird of him to bring up two standards and then only discuss one.
will it be weirder if Lynch disregards that "blank spot", too? If I follow you, seems like it would be .... weird ... if she did
there are three potential positions here:
1. Gross negligence is not an applicable standard (apparently it's never been used in cases like this before)
2. It is an applicable standard, but it doesn't seem likely to get a conviction.
3. It is an applicable standard and she was grossly negligent.
I assume that lynch will take one of those 3 positions, probably the first or second.