karn wrote:Youseff wrote:Conservative social media really going in on this poor Ahmed kid. What a shitty political party.
Is it shitty simply to question the story? If so, why? Have you read this piece?
This is one of the few times the comments section is actually a lot more rational than the article. The kid said the whole project took him only few minutes. Are you stuck on whether he "invented" a clock? I'm pretty sure that's been done. It looks like he transferred the workings of an old clock to a pencil case. Not Nobel stuff, but probably interesting enough to a ninth grader.
Having established that the kid didn't pioneer (see what I did there, electronics nerds?) the creation of electronic timepieces, the author somehow makes the leap, or rather, nudges the reader to make the leap, that what he must have created instead is a hoax bomb. Or a bomb hoax. He seems to use these interchangeably, even though they're different. But what both of them need is a hoax-at some point pretending that the object is not benign, but is actually destructive.Do you have any evidence this ever happened?Somehow, I don't think you tend to show a hoax bomb to your teacher or bring it to class with you and show it off as a clock. What the the author actually seems to be claiming is that the student created a hoax clock. Pretending that you have invented a clock may in fact deserve scorn, but I'm pretty sure it's not a terrorist crime at this point.