CalvinBall wrote:jh, you said obama didnt propose meaningful cuts. what is this all about then?
Obama's proposals were parameters he was willing to accept at best, not an actual plan to cut spending.
CalvinBall wrote:jh, you said obama didnt propose meaningful cuts. what is this all about then?
jerseyhoya wrote:CalvinBall wrote:jh, you said obama didnt propose meaningful cuts. what is this all about then?
Obama's proposals were parameters he was willing to accept at best, not an actual plan to cut spending.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
CalvinBall wrote:christie laying into house repubs.
My remarks on the House Floor right now in ABSOLUTE ANGER at Speaker Boehner and GOP Leadership for adjourning before federal assistance for our communities and those devastated by Hurricane Sandy could be voted on. Raising hell will the NJ/NY delegations and Governors Christie & Cuomo. UNACCEPTABLE that other regions get immediate assistance in their time of need but our families and businesses do not.
CalvinBall wrote:#tcot is not happy. i think they are done with christie.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
CalvinBall wrote:#tcot is not happy. i think they are done with christie.
jerseyhoya wrote:CalvinBall wrote:jh, you said obama didnt propose meaningful cuts. what is this all about then?
Obama's proposals were parameters he was willing to accept at best, not an actual plan to cut spending.
CalvinBall wrote:in other things house republicans failed to do:
the VAWA act expired.
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/ ... n-act?lite
CalvinBall wrote:in other things house republicans failed to do:
the VAWA act expired.
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/ ... n-act?lite
One of the ways such bills exist is through clever naming of leftist proposals. We have "prochoice" instead of "pro-abortion" and we have this law, which promises to end violence against women. Those who oppose such positive-sounding measures appear to be heartless and are on the defensive at the outset. But there is no escaping the negative aspects of this act. The bill is a boondoggle for feminist groups (follow the money) and the funds go to "re-train" judges and other officials in the details of "women's rights" rather than addressing the major problems of battered women who end up in hospital emergency rooms. We know from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that there are roughly 30 factors that lead to violent, abusive behavior, most notably, anger, drug addiction, and alcohol abuse. Sadly, instead of rehabilitation programs that address those behaviors, the Violence Against Women Act promotes a feminist agenda.