We're doing it, POLITICS style

by **pacino** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:09:05

this guy was flown in to save mitt

by **dajafi** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:09:07

td11 wrote:get um

keep bringing up things romney said in primaries

This. The gulf between who he was in February and who he's trying to be in october is potentially devastating.

That said, I agree with Paul that Romney isn't horrible. He's a smart guy, capable of thinking on his feet and obviously not feeling obligated to any standard of consistency.

But Obama is probably having the best debate I've ever seen him have. At the very, very least I'm sure he's bucked up the Democrats, and I'm guessing he's won back some independents and undecided.

by **Bucky** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:09:29

pacino wrote:latkas? mmmm

by **pacino** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:09:56

dajafi wrote:
td11 wrote:get um

keep bringing up things romney said in primaries

This. The gulf between who he was in February and who he's trying to be in october is potentially devastating.

That said, I agree with Paul that Romney isn't horrible. He's a smart guy, capable of thinking on his feet and obviously not feeling obligated to any standard of consistency.

But Obama is probably having the best debate I've ever seen him have. At the very, very least I'm sure he's bucked up the Democrats, and I'm guessing he's won back some independents and undecided.

by standard of consistency, do you mean some kind of baseline of political ideals?? he appears to be the most purely sleazy politician whose run for prez in a long time

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:10:14

You know, if one of these guys would just directly answer the questions asked, that would be a novelty that might get one of them elected, even if the answer they give is something like "It was my fault and I'm sorry."

by **TenuredVulture** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:10:25

pacino wrote:this guy was flown in to save mitt

My buddies in Mineola don't like the brown dude much, but I'm not like that.

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:10:36

I mean, come on Mr. President, answer the fucking question.

by **jamiethekiller** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:10:46

republicans voted down increased funding for this, right?

by **CalvinBall** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:11:03

Bad answer.

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:11:07

pacino wrote:this guy was flown in to save mitt

It's a fair question.

by **pacino** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:11:31

they fucked up in libya. it's not a goddamn administration killer. just admit it, move on, whatever. mitt trying to make crazy political hay out of it is just pathetic, tbh.

by **TenuredVulture** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:12:13

And Romney isn't doing a good job with it at all. Like he wasn't prepared for it.

by **CalvinBall** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:12:14

jamiethekiller wrote:republicans voted down increased funding for this, right?

Right. But apparently didnt have to do with funding. Honestly it seems to me that it's just something Obama never saw. The request for more security. Someone denied it along the ladder and that's it.

by **drsmooth** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:12:22

mozartpc27 wrote:You know, if one of these guys would just directly answer the questions asked, that would be a novelty that might get one of them elected, even if the answer they give is something like "It was my fault and I'm sorry."

you ARE drunk

by **pacino** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:12:42

mitt was way too quick to judge, and the prez was too slow to judge. i'd prefer slow in something like this. gather the facts first.

by **pacino** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:13:06

CalvinBall wrote:
jamiethekiller wrote:republicans voted down increased funding for this, right?

Right. But apparently didnt have to do with funding. Honestly it seems to me that it's just something Obama never saw. The request for more security. Someone denied it along the ladder and that's it.

doubt it got to him

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:13:20

pacino wrote:they fucked up in libya. it's not a goddamn administration killer. just admit it, move on, whatever. mitt trying to make crazy political hay out of it is just pathetic, tbh.

You know how the three most important things in real estate are location, location, location.

Well, you might say the same is true in politics: location in time. So, timing, timing, timing. No one gives a shit if this Libya thing happens in September of 2011. Too bad for Obama it was September 2012.

by **pacino** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:13:37

mozartpc27 wrote:
pacino wrote:this guy was flown in to save mitt

It's a fair question.

i didnt say it wasnt??? should i put little brackets for <joke></joke>??

Website · by **Wolfgang622** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:14:05

drsmooth wrote:
mozartpc27 wrote:You know, if one of these guys would just directly answer the questions asked, that would be a novelty that might get one of them elected, even if the answer they give is something like "It was my fault and I'm sorry."

you ARE drunk

Yeah, I suppose so.

by **TenuredVulture** » Tue Oct 16, 2012 22:14:08

So, Syrian democrats are ok, Libyan ones are not?

Archived

We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style

Re: We're doing it, POLITICS style