thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Many times the lines are so funny, I laugh out loud, and I’m laughing about the scene that I staged myself! You couldn't get a better compliment as a director.
"The point of the film was to kick these terrible people off the throne that made them demons, making them real and their actions into reality," he says. "I think it's only fair if now it's taken as part of our history, and used for whatever purposes people like."
TenuredVulture wrote:Isn't Aspergers (like a lot these kinds of things) essentially a constellation of symptoms? If I'm right about that, then isn't also the case the a lot so-called syndromes really just mean some challenges coping with certain expectations. It's only a disorder because society expects certain responses. ADHD for instance only really emerges in large numbers when schools start expecting 7 year olds to sit at a desk for 8 hours a day. I can't do that now. But if the child were say helping the family plant crops or hunt rabbits for dinner or even feed chickesn, there wouldn't be any reason to to diagnose the child as anything.
I know there's a spectrum here, and some people really cannot function without sustained interventions. On the other hand, do we really want to diagnose every personality quirk that someone may have as a syndrome?
The Dude wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Isn't Aspergers (like a lot these kinds of things) essentially a constellation of symptoms? If I'm right about that, then isn't also the case the a lot so-called syndromes really just mean some challenges coping with certain expectations. It's only a disorder because society expects certain responses. ADHD for instance only really emerges in large numbers when schools start expecting 7 year olds to sit at a desk for 8 hours a day. I can't do that now. But if the child were say helping the family plant crops or hunt rabbits for dinner or even feed chickesn, there wouldn't be any reason to to diagnose the child as anything.
I know there's a spectrum here, and some people really cannot function without sustained interventions. On the other hand, do we really want to diagnose every personality quirk that someone may have as a syndrome?
It's definitely a lot more than a personality quirk, though.
ADHD is much more than kids not being able to sit in class for 8 hours. The symptoms emerge before kids are even in actual school
TenuredVulture wrote:The Dude wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Isn't Aspergers (like a lot these kinds of things) essentially a constellation of symptoms? If I'm right about that, then isn't also the case the a lot so-called syndromes really just mean some challenges coping with certain expectations. It's only a disorder because society expects certain responses. ADHD for instance only really emerges in large numbers when schools start expecting 7 year olds to sit at a desk for 8 hours a day. I can't do that now. But if the child were say helping the family plant crops or hunt rabbits for dinner or even feed chickesn, there wouldn't be any reason to to diagnose the child as anything.
I know there's a spectrum here, and some people really cannot function without sustained interventions. On the other hand, do we really want to diagnose every personality quirk that someone may have as a syndrome?
It's definitely a lot more than a personality quirk, though.
ADHD is much more than kids not being able to sit in class for 8 hours. The symptoms emerge before kids are even in actual school
All I'm saying is much of what we might consider "mental illness" has a lot to do with social structure and the ensuing expectations.