seke2 wrote:TomatoPie wrote:seke2 wrote:I don't think Obama supporters are necessarily contending that he has all this amazing experience. But he has a perspective, a world-view, and he's had about 6-8 years in the public eye to show the world what he wants to do. He's taken a stance on just about every notable issue and people know what he's about.
Perhaps Palin has those same things, and perhaps she's the Republican Obama...but 60 days is a very, very short time for her to convince people that her inexperience doesn't matter. Because obviously, most of Obama's supporters (myself included), are willing to overlook his relative inexperience because of his inspirational leadership abilities and his goals (whether or not he has the prior experience to necessarily make all of those goals a reality).
6-8 for Saint Barry, 13 for Gov Palin. And executive experience, which is totally mising on the Obama CV.
And all but 1.5 of those 13 were running a town of like 5000 people where it seems like her biggest issue was whether or not to build a sports stadium. I think that Obama's political experience trumps hers, except for maybe the last 1.5 years. Even as governor of Alaska, she only has, what, 500k constituents? That's less than Obama has ever had in any of his major roles. Definitely true that she had executive experience and Obama didn't, but we've had Presidents who didn't have executive experience before and they haven't all been disasters.
Lincoln comes to mind.
And if you want an example of leadership/management: running a debt-free campaign from the ground up, based on so many active small donors in 18 months, defeating someone no one thought could be beaten and blowing over one of the strongest political machines ever, and doing so as a bi-racial man with a Muslim name post-911...I mean, dude can manage and lead people. Do we need to argue that point? Policy differences are fair game, but don't tell me he can't lead.