phuturephillies wrote:Grant was a lousy actor. Poor delivery, mediocre body language on screen, and none of his parts were really believable. I think people fawn over him because he made crappy movies before most of us were born, and he was "cool" then. He's garbage, to be completely honest. I'd rather watch Major League 3 on loop for the rest of my life than a Cary Grant movie.

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

Drugs Delaney wrote:

phuturephillies wrote:Grant was a lousy actor. Poor delivery, mediocre body language on screen, and none of his parts were really believable. I think people fawn over him because he made crappy movies before most of us were born, and he was "cool" then. He's garbage, to be completely honest. I'd rather watch Major League 3 on loop for the rest of my life than a Cary Grant movie.

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

Seriously. Major League 3 is awesome.

Drugs Delaney wrote:

phuturephillies wrote:Grant was a lousy actor. Poor delivery, mediocre body language on screen, and none of his parts were really believable. I think people fawn over him because he made crappy movies before most of us were born, and he was "cool" then. He's garbage, to be completely honest. I'd rather watch Major League 3 on loop for the rest of my life than a Cary Grant movie.

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

quality rebuttal, you have swayed me sir

guy would've been a bit player on a show like Boy Meets World.

Drugs Delaney wrote:Oh, I get it. You can't think of anything good to write about in your blog so you fill the space with videos of a show you know is lame, but you still enjoy it.

I apologize for not putting enough time into a time-waster. I will try harder from now on. Once I get your book I will see how I can implement your style into mine.

pacino wrote:

Drugs Delaney wrote:

phuturephillies wrote:Grant was a lousy actor. Poor delivery, mediocre body language on screen, and none of his parts were really believable. I think people fawn over him because he made crappy movies before most of us were born, and he was "cool" then. He's garbage, to be completely honest. I'd rather watch Major League 3 on loop for the rest of my life than a Cary Grant movie.

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

quality rebuttal, you have swayed me sir

guy would've been a bit player on a show like Boy Meets World.

It wasn't a rebuttal, but nice try anyway. And Cary Grant wouldn't have done trash like Boy Meets World.

Drugs Delaney wrote:

phuturephillies wrote:Grant was a lousy actor. Poor delivery, mediocre body language on screen, and none of his parts were really believable. I think people fawn over him because he made crappy movies before most of us were born, and he was "cool" then. He's garbage, to be completely honest. I'd rather watch Major League 3 on loop for the rest of my life than a Cary Grant movie.

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

That is where we're going to have to disagree.

pacino wrote:

Drugs Delaney wrote:Oh, I get it. You can't think of anything good to write about in your blog so you fill the space with videos of a show you know is lame, but you still enjoy it.

I apologize for not putting enough time into a time-waster. I will try harder from now on. Once I get your book I will see how I can implement your style into mine.

Sounds like a plan.

Topanga used to be every 13 year old boy's dream.

Drugs Delaney wrote:

pacino wrote:

Drugs Delaney wrote:Oh, I get it. You can't think of anything good to write about in your blog so you fill the space with videos of a show you know is lame, but you still enjoy it.

I apologize for not putting enough time into a time-waster. I will try harder from now on. Once I get your book I will see how I can implement your style into mine.

Sounds like a plan.

I have a second book idea. Scrap another Hitchcock one and go after a better director. Michael Bay has had a lot of hits. People love his movies, and they're actually in color and have cool explosions. That already makes them better.

I'll bet Cary Grant went to lots of impromptu naked parties

phuturephillies wrote:

Drugs Delaney wrote:

phuturephillies wrote:Grant was a lousy actor. Poor delivery, mediocre body language on screen, and none of his parts were really believable. I think people fawn over him because he made crappy movies before most of us were born, and he was "cool" then. He's garbage, to be completely honest. I'd rather watch Major League 3 on loop for the rest of my life than a Cary Grant movie.

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

That is where we're going to have to disagree.

Okay, but you are aware your statement was ridiculous, right? None of his parts were really believable? Have you seen ALL of his movies such that you're qualified to even make a statement like that? Have you seen The Philadelphia Story, Bringing Up Baby, Destination Tokyo, Notorious, Charade or His Girl Friday? These are all timeless classics. You cannot possibly think that these movies were all crappy and he wasn't believable.

Woody wrote:I'll bet Cary Grant went to lots of impromptu naked parties

not with many ladies though

pacino wrote:

Drugs Delaney wrote:

pacino wrote:

Drugs Delaney wrote:Oh, I get it. You can't think of anything good to write about in your blog so you fill the space with videos of a show you know is lame, but you still enjoy it.

I apologize for not putting enough time into a time-waster. I will try harder from now on. Once I get your book I will see how I can implement your style into mine.

Sounds like a plan.

I have a second book idea. Scrap another Hitchcock one and go after a better director. Michael Bay has had a lot of hits. People love his movies, and they're actually in color and have cool explosions. That already makes them better.

Yeah, but his films don't have much depth. And Hitchcock made lots of color films.

pacino wrote:

Woody wrote:I'll bet Cary Grant went to lots of impromptu naked parties

not with many ladies though

Cary Grant did go both ways.

Drugs Delaney wrote:

phuturephillies wrote:

Drugs Delaney wrote:

phuturephillies wrote:Grant was a lousy actor. Poor delivery, mediocre body language on screen, and none of his parts were really believable. I think people fawn over him because he made crappy movies before most of us were born, and he was "cool" then. He's garbage, to be completely honest. I'd rather watch Major League 3 on loop for the rest of my life than a Cary Grant movie.

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

That is where we're going to have to disagree.

Okay, but you are aware your statement was ridiculous, right? None of his parts were really believable? Have you seen ALL of his movies such that you're qualified to even make a statement like that? Have you seen The Philadelphia Story, Bringing Up Baby, Destination Tokyo, Notorious, Charade or His Girl Friday? These are all timeless classics. You cannot possibly think that these movies were all crappy and he wasn't believable.

They all basically suck. I've seen probably 30 of his movies. My grandmom used to make me watch them. And I'd be asleep 6 minutes in, 16 minutes tops. If I want to fall asleep, I'd just have to put Philadelphia Story on and I'd be out in 10 minutes, even if the ground was opening up right outside and swallowing all the life from the Earth.

Drugs Delaney wrote:

pacino wrote:

Drugs Delaney wrote:

pacino wrote:

Drugs Delaney wrote:Oh, I get it. You can't think of anything good to write about in your blog so you fill the space with videos of a show you know is lame, but you still enjoy it.

I apologize for not putting enough time into a time-waster. I will try harder from now on. Once I get your book I will see how I can implement your style into mine.

Sounds like a plan.

I have a second book idea. Scrap another Hitchcock one and go after a better director. Michael Bay has had a lot of hits. People love his movies, and they're actually in color and have cool explosions. That already makes them better.

Yeah, but his films don't have much depth. And Hitchcock made lots of color films.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Armageddon, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The Island, Transformers, have you seen these movies? The depth is incredible and multi-layered. He is truly the genius of our, and probably of all,time.

pacino wrote:You have no idea what you're talking about. Armageddon, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The Island, Transformers, have you seen these movies? The depth is incredible and multi-layered. He is truly the genius of our, and probably of all,time.

How can you leave out that Verizon FIOS commercial? I was nearly moved to tears the first time I saw it.

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=MiHsxQJ9ZOo[/youtube]

Mmm genius.

Michael Bay doesn't need to be in every single one of his films to satisfy his own ego. The poon tang is enough

phuturephillies wrote:They all basically suck. I've seen probably 30 of his movies. My grandmom used to make me watch them. And I'd be asleep 6 minutes in, 16 minutes tops. If I want to fall asleep, I'd just have to put Philadelphia Story on and I'd be out in 10 minutes, even if the ground was opening up right outside and swallowing all the life from the Earth.

Okay so you saw them as a kid. That explains everything. I'm sure you had a well developed appreciation for the art of film as a kid.

Woody wrote:Michael Bay doesn't need to be in every single one of his films to satisfy his own ego. The poon tang is enough

Hitchcock was only in about half of his films. And from what I've read, he only had sex once in his life. He was a complete weirdo.