2007 game thread database

by **CFP** » Mon May 14, 2007 14:56:18

1 wrote:
ColeforPresident wrote:So does all this mean I should make tonight's game thread?

Unless y'all want me to make another spot start.

BERNERO

by 1 » Mon May 14, 2007 14:56:49

ColeforPresident wrote:
1 wrote:
ColeforPresident wrote:So does all this mean I should make tonight's game thread?

Unless y'all want me to make another spot start.

BERNERO

Not exactly. They won my start.

by **seke2** » Mon May 14, 2007 14:56:51

ColeforPresident wrote:So does all this mean I should make tonight's game thread?

Hey you're the staff ace so far, you call your own shots dude. Just keep Kenny away from the hill.

by **Bakestar** » Mon May 14, 2007 16:12:54

Shore wrote:
Bakestar wrote:Suggestion: Bold/italicize the wins.

I thought they already were.

zing

by **The Red Tornado** » Mon May 14, 2007 16:21:33

We cant overuse CFP or else he's going to get carpal tunnel and blow out his typing hand. I say we use him in must win situations...

by **philliesphhan** » Mon May 14, 2007 17:00:25

seke2 wrote:Because I am a supernerd as TRT noted, I made an Access database for this analysis and I was able to fairly easily add this criteria. However, because there is a theoretical limit to even my nerdiness, I didn't go too far with it.

I added a criteria for defining a game as a "close loss" meaning that we lost by 2 runs or less. Adding this in makes ColeforPresident look even better, as both of his losses were close games. kenrosenthal, on the other hand, only has 1 close loss despite his 0-4 record. No other major insights came out in adding this additional brilliant level of statistical analysis.

ken's threads are basically worthless
sometimes he starts a thread and disappears, thus not giving us a quality start
another time i remember he said we won "when i do play by play"
he did play by play for an inning then vanished

by 1 » Mon May 14, 2007 17:09:01

FRESHMANITIS LOL

by **kenrosenthal** » Mon May 14, 2007 18:02:32

philliesphhan wrote:another time i remember he said we won "when i do play by play"
he did play by play for an inning then vanished

please cite

by **philliesphhan** » Mon May 14, 2007 18:48:58

surprisingly easier to find than i thought
in this thread, they only started winning when you disappeared
then in the next thread, you say

kenrosenthal wrote:does anyone object if I do pbp again - they are 1-0 when i do it

by 1 » Mon May 14, 2007 19:05:51

philliesphhan wrote:surprisingly easier to find than i thought
in this thread, they only started winning when you disappeared
then in the next thread, you say

kenrosenthal wrote:does anyone object if I do pbp again - they are 1-0 when i do it

by **kenrosenthal** » Mon May 14, 2007 19:06:39

philliesphhan wrote:surprisingly easier to find than i thought
in this thread, they only started winning when you disappeared

philliesphhan wrote:he did play by play for an inning then vanished

I stopped 15 pages in. where did i do pbp for one inning and disappear?

by **philliesphhan** » Mon May 14, 2007 19:11:18

close enough

by **kenrosenthal** » Mon May 14, 2007 19:13:03

no, not really.

by **philliesphhan** » Mon May 14, 2007 19:15:53

you still said they're 1-0 when you do play by play which was only the case when you stopped

by **kenrosenthal** » Mon May 14, 2007 19:17:32

pp, ok. but they did win the game.

by **philliesphhan** » Mon May 14, 2007 19:20:24

given our argument, i think we've officially ruined the internet

by **kenrosenthal** » Mon May 14, 2007 19:26:50

philliesphhan wrote:given our argument, i think we've officially ruined the internet

hah - aight.

by **The Red Tornado** » Tue May 15, 2007 09:07:31

The CFP magic continues. 5-2

by **seke2** » Wed May 16, 2007 09:44:06

BigEd improves to 1-0, joining the ranks of the undefeated. The baseball gods overlooked his last minute switch of the game thread title from "verbose" to "brief" and granted us an exciting win!

When the same poster who "won" the previous day starts the next day's game thread, the Phils are: 3-8
When a different poster from the previous day's winner starters the next day's game thread, the Phils are: 4-3

by **BigEd76** » Wed May 16, 2007 17:59:35

same starting 8 Phillies lineup as last night, while the Brewers switched up 5 through 8

I can't start the thread though...

Archived

2007 game thread database