CalvinBall wrote:early top 25 looks for next year
(this one from cbs' john rothstein)
1. Duke
2. Villanova
3. Kansas
4. Xavier
5. Kentucky
6. Virginia
7. Wisconsin
8. Oregon
9. UCLA
10. Arizona
11. Michigan State
12. Louisville
13. West Virginia
14. USC
15. UNC
16. Dayton
17. UConn
18. Cincinnati
19. Syracuse
20. Gonzaga
21. URI
22. Michigan
23. Creighton
24. Colorado
25. Virginia Tech
Luzinski's Gut wrote:I was living in London in 1985 so this is so, so sweet to experience first hand.
Bill Raftery is on my top 3 list of guys I'd like to have beers with. Love his schtick. ONIONS!
#$!&@ UNC, the ACC and the NCAA.
mtcal wrote:CalvinBall wrote:early top 25 looks for next year
(this one from cbs' john rothstein)
1. Duke
2. Villanova
3. Kansas
4. Xavier
5. Kentucky
6. Virginia
7. Wisconsin
8. Oregon
9. UCLA
10. Arizona
11. Michigan State
12. Louisville
13. West Virginia
14. USC
15. UNC
16. Dayton
17. UConn
18. Cincinnati
19. Syracuse
20. Gonzaga
21. URI
22. Michigan
23. Creighton
24. Colorado
25. Virginia Tech
gona suck loosing arch and ochefu but this team's returning a ton (assuming no one is stupid and goes pro too early in an already deep draft) and it's going to be tough to stop a lot of them.
i don't pay close enough attention to see what their recruiting is like but it seems like every year they have a really good freshman or two coming in. brunson looks extremely capable at the point, hart and jenkins are going to both probably average 15+, and booth has shown he's a legit scorer too.
i didn't want to start talking about this yet and bask in the glory, but since someone brought it up..
pacino wrote:Squire wrote:It was cool seeing Rollie and Ed Pinckney there. Kerry Kittles and Kyle Lowry. Thought that was really neat.
Rollie sucks! Good for the players, though
PTOITWCFTPP wrote:Nova had a legit road to win this thing.
Beat a 3/2/1/1.
Highest seed the cheaters beat was a 5. Imagine that, they couldn't play anymore crap teams, a real team beat them.
PTOITWCFTPP wrote:Nova had a legit road to win this thing.
Beat a 3/2/1/1.
Highest seed the cheaters beat was a 5. Imagine that, they couldn't play anymore crap teams, a real team beat them.
CalvinBall wrote:next time these teams should request to play higher seeded teams even if those higher seeded teams lose the round prior. what a bunch of gutless cowards playing a few double digit seeds.
This notwithstanding, that 3/2/1/1 was a good Miami team, the hottest player in the tournament, and the best two teams pre-tournament. No backing into this one.The Savior wrote:PTOITWCFTPP wrote:Nova had a legit road to win this thing.
Beat a 3/2/1/1.
Highest seed the cheaters beat was a 5. Imagine that, they couldn't play anymore crap teams, a real team beat them.
You're so far gone. I think you legitimately need counseling.
MoBettle wrote:CalvinBall wrote:next time these teams should request to play higher seeded teams even if those higher seeded teams lose the round prior. what a bunch of gutless cowards playing a few double digit seeds.
Well they eventually played higher seeded teams and lost to them.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
CalvinBall wrote:MoBettle wrote:CalvinBall wrote:next time these teams should request to play higher seeded teams even if those higher seeded teams lose the round prior. what a bunch of gutless cowards playing a few double digit seeds.
Well they eventually played higher seeded teams and lost to them.
only one team goes undefeated in the tournament. what do you want?
MoBettle wrote:CalvinBall wrote:MoBettle wrote:CalvinBall wrote:next time these teams should request to play higher seeded teams even if those higher seeded teams lose the round prior. what a bunch of gutless cowards playing a few double digit seeds.
Well they eventually played higher seeded teams and lost to them.
only one team goes undefeated in the tournament. what do you want?
Uhhh I don't really want anything, just thought it was funny how after that first weekend narrative of how strong the conference was that every single team fell short when they went against real competition.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.