dajafi wrote:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2iFhGtKO-Q[/youtube]
Jesus what a scumbag
dajafi wrote:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2iFhGtKO-Q[/youtube]
Woody wrote:dajafi wrote:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2iFhGtKO-Q[/youtube]
Jesus what a scumbag
Bakestar wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:Can we not call February 5th "Super Duper Tuesday," please?
I propose "Big, Thick, Veiny, Throbbing, Purple-headed Tuesday".
dajafi wrote:On the other hand, it is pretty wild that those Iowans--white midwesterners--look like they're going for a black guy named "Barack Obama."
dajafi wrote:Watching 9ui11iani, I really do expect him to unhinge his jaw and eat small children or domestic animals--ferrets probably.
Did you guys see his last ad? Not sure I've laughed harder at anything all week.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2iFhGtKO-Q[/youtube]
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
VoxOrion wrote:Who needs TV, we have BSG.
pacino wrote:Obama basically took everyone under 30 and a lot of the people between 30 and 45. He's going to take this thing if he can continue to draw younger people to actually come out and vote.
The much-maligned youth vote appears to have showed up for Obama. In the entrance poll I'm looking at,22% of voters were 17-29, and he got 57% of them. Interestingly, Huckabee also did well among (relatively) young voters, scoring higher among voters 17-29 and 30-44 than among older voters. Also, 37% of GOP voters said it mattered a great deal that a candidate shared their religious beliefs. Huck got 55% of them. 30% said it mattered somewhat and Huck split them with Romney, Huck 28, Romney 26. Romeny won 39% of the voters who cared not much/not at all. Huck got 2% of the not at all.
(Re: increase in youth vote between 2004 and 2008) Andy Kohut says it was 17% in 2004, and that up to 22% is a notable bump.
VoxOrion wrote:Wow. Thompson in third beating McCain? That's really, really good news.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Woody wrote:Bakestar wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:Can we not call February 5th "Super Duper Tuesday," please?
I propose "Big, Thick, Veiny, Throbbing, Purple-headed Tuesday".
drsmooth wrote:Woody wrote:Bakestar wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:Can we not call February 5th "Super Duper Tuesday," please?
I propose "Big, Thick, Veiny, Throbbing, Purple-headed Tuesday".
you guys must get way out of hand when the talk turns to "polling"