mcare89 wrote:S2D wrote:heyeaglefn wrote:He counted against the cap during the summer.
and who cares about that since they let you exceed the cap during the summer anyway?
He ate up most of the amount you can go over. You can go over 10%, which this year is about $7 million. Pronger's hit is about $5 million.
Plus, if they're buying out Gagner, that's huge cap savings.
heyeaglefn wrote:LongDrive wrote:I think it's dumb that Pronger still counts as a cap hit.
35 and older contract. If they didn't do that you'd just sign a guy for 30 years to spread out the cap hit.
ReadingPhilly wrote:heyeaglefn wrote:LongDrive wrote:I think it's dumb that Pronger still counts as a cap hit.
35 and older contract. If they didn't do that you'd just sign a guy for 30 years to spread out the cap hit.
Should obviously be an exception for a legitimate career ending injury though.
Grotewold wrote:Hearing Flyers close to shedding the rights to Chico Resch
mcare89 wrote:S2D wrote:heyeaglefn wrote:He counted against the cap during the summer.
and who cares about that since they let you exceed the cap during the summer anyway?
He ate up most of the amount you can go over. You can go over 10%, which this year is about $7 million. Pronger's hit is about $5 million.
Plus, if they're buying out Gagner, that's huge cap savings.
PTOITWCFTPP wrote:This is not a pointless deal.....
Brantt wrote:PTOITWCFTPP wrote:This is not a pointless deal.....
It certainly is unless they buy him out. Otherwise, they obtained a garbage player and took an additional $200K cap hit.
Has to be a buy out.
The Savior wrote:Ok so some added flexibility today, but not an overly impactful trade for a Day 1 of the season cap perspective.
The Savior wrote:Extend Jake this offseason?
PSUPhilliesPhan wrote:The Savior wrote:Extend Jake this offseason?
Yes. 6m/year sound fair?