momadance wrote:

Youseff wrote:CNN fired a bunch of photojournalists because good cameras are so accessible nowadays.

Shitty photogs still take shitty pics no matter what gear they have.

Ya I should have worded it better. That was their logic.

It always cracks me up going through Flickr groups of expensive cameras.

For example the Mamiya ZD is probably around 10k, and someone liked this pic they took with their 10K camera enough to share it with the world

http://www.flickr.com/photos/barryzees/ ... l-mamiyazd

Remote controls: No intricacies in man made items, unlike Nature's Fauna & Flora.

baby chameleons [via reddit]

Wow

inspirational!

I'm going to put it on my class website!

Ended up getting the Canon T3, but waited on price a bit. Saw canon.com was having a sale last night and bought a refurb for $370

Boom

mt. rainier

(reddit again)

Pretty good. HDR, I'm guessing.

I have a bunch of unlabeled old family photos, and I mean probably old enough that even those who knew the people in them are now dead.

Is there a site that's good with at least identifying the era of the photos based on the style of clothing, etc?

milky way from the himalayas

That can't be real.

can't believe they called it the Milky Way

they named it after the candy bar

NYC in the 80's ... Pretty cool stuff.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevensieg ... 600545186/

I didn't take these photos, but our wedding photographer submitted our pictures to the Knot and we made the Spring 2012 NYC edition.

http://www.erikekroth.blogspot.com/2012 ... dding.html

Hit up that miserable Flyers game on Sunday..

moma, i know you probably put it on here before, but can you list your equipment on here? those are so sharp

my friend recently made a book of his first year of photography. you can check it out here

http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/2 ... tore-share