PhillieMooDo wrote:Btw, if you vote third party, don't call yourself anti-Trump. You'd be helping him win.

jerseyhoya wrote:

PhillieMooDo wrote:Btw, if you vote third party, don't call yourself anti-Trump. You'd be helping him win.

If it is required to say you'd vote for Tulsi Gabbard or Williamson to be anti-Trump, you're going to be closing the door on a lot of people who don't like the president.

Why so eager to alienate potential allies?

jerseyhoya wrote:I mean, I don't like Donald Trump at all. I'll take my chances with another four years of him over Tulsi Gabbard.

That said, it is good to see you're on board for Biden in the primary emphasizing the importance of voting for the person with the best chance of beating Trump.

swishnicholson wrote:

Wolfgang622 wrote:

Gimpy wrote:$12,000/year isn’t that much of a disincentive to work. That’s way below the poverty line. If anything, it may keep one member of a married couple from having to work as they’d get $24k extra income (and Yang is also pushing Medicare for all pretty hard so neither would rely on work for insurance).

Remember all that hand-wringing when gay marriage was not legal yet from people who were like "slippery slope floodgates what next bigamy!?!?!?!"

I keep thinking that the way things are going that states will have to legalize marriage among three or more people, because people will require that many incomes to keep one house with a few kids going. As it is right now it would be pretty fucking useful at my house, say, if while my wife and I went to work there were somebody home like making sure the house didn't fall apart and kept the laundry done and whatnot. It's either that or we all need three day weekends: one day for socializing, one day for errand running and chore-doing, and one day to, you know, rest.

Three spouse families and three day weekends: VOTE WOLFGANG 2032!!!!!

You've got phred's vote

Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Really bad news! The Baltimore house of Elijah Cummings was robbed. Too bad!

Squire wrote:Klobuchar qualified for next round of debates. I think she has a chance of getting the Biden votes when he fades.

jerseyhoya wrote:The lack of vetting by the White House has multiple positives from their perspective. They don't have to do the work on the front end, then on the back end when the utter absence of prep blows up in their face, the prez can just blame the LAMESTREAM MEDIA.

jerseyhoya wrote:The lack of vetting by the White House has multiple positives from their perspective. They don't have to do the work on the front end, then on the back end when the utter absence of prep blows up in their face, the prez can just blame the LAMESTREAM MEDIA.