by momadance » Wed May 01, 2019 11:38:28
Phred wrote:thephan wrote:
LOL they missed beeping Graham when he read "Trump is a F'ing idiot" on live TV.
With friends like these...
Seriously, isn't Graham supposed to be on Trump's side? I guess I need to hear or read the quote to get the context but it is hard to imagine a scenario where it is construed as a good thing to have your ally call you a fucking idiot.
by thephan » Wed May 01, 2019 12:24:58
by Phred » Wed May 01, 2019 12:43:06
by jerseyhoya » Wed May 01, 2019 13:06:24
by thephan » Wed May 01, 2019 13:22:10
jerseyhoya wrote:Montana gov Steve Bullock is reportedly going to announce for prez
And DeBlasio was doing polling in Iowa last night
by swishnicholson » Wed May 01, 2019 13:53:03
thephan wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:Montana gov Steve Bullock is reportedly going to announce for prez
And DeBlasio was doing polling in Iowa last night
Steve Bullock going for that national name recognition.
DeBlasio, fuhgeddaboudit
by momadance » Wed May 01, 2019 14:12:39
Barr wrote:"No, I didn't exonerate. I said that we did not believe that there was sufficient evidence to establish an obstruction offense which is the job of the justice department."
by Werthless » Wed May 01, 2019 14:17:56
momadance wrote:Barr wrote:"No, I didn't exonerate. I said that we did not believe that there was sufficient evidence to establish an obstruction offense which is the job of the justice department."
FULL EXONERATION! NO COLLUSION!
by CalvinBall » Wed May 01, 2019 14:22:12
jerseyhoya wrote:Montana gov Steve Bullock is reportedly going to announce for prez
And DeBlasio was doing polling in Iowa last night
by JFLNYC » Wed May 01, 2019 14:42:58
Werthless wrote:momadance wrote:Barr wrote:"No, I didn't exonerate. I said that we did not believe that there was sufficient evidence to establish an obstruction offense which is the job of the justice department."
FULL EXONERATION! NO COLLUSION!
It's the job of Congress, actually, if we're talking about the President.
by momadance » Wed May 01, 2019 14:48:27
by Bucky » Wed May 01, 2019 14:48:40
CalvinBall wrote:thephan wrote:"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this office’s work and conclusions," Mueller wrote in the letter on March 27, according to the Post. "There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations."
brilliant. Let's not impeach though.
by Grotewold » Wed May 01, 2019 15:03:52
momadance wrote:FFS
@kylegriffin1
Barr tells Kamala Harris that neither he nor Rosenstein looked at the underlying evidence in Mueller's report.
by CalvinBall » Wed May 01, 2019 15:31:27
by momadance » Wed May 01, 2019 15:42:47
CalvinBall wrote:our AG is a political hack for our criminal president
by Trent Steele » Wed May 01, 2019 15:45:00
by thephan » Wed May 01, 2019 16:53:07
by Trent Steele » Wed May 01, 2019 16:55:54
thephan wrote:Barr said Mueller’s letter is “snitty” and probably was not written by him.
by thephan » Wed May 01, 2019 17:03:37
by thephan » Wed May 01, 2019 17:14:54
Fox News host Chris Wallace:
"I know there’s some people who don’t think that this March 27 letter is a big deal," Wallace said, referring to the letter Mueller wrote to Barr, before clarifying: "Some opinion people, some opinion people who appear on this network, who may be pushing a political agenda.”
“But, you know we have to deal in facts,” he added.
“There are a lot of people who have read now the full report or as much as has been not redacted agree that he didn’t reveal what was fully in the report” Wallace said. “Again, those aren’t opinions. That’s not a political agenda. Those are the facts.”
