thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
The Savior wrote:Back to back close losses are still loses. Dems spending but not realizing any gains.
JUburton wrote:Romney won this district by like 20%. They held their nose to vote for Trump. The fact that Ossoff even has a chance against a normal Republican is good news.
Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?
Yeah, I just mean for what it may portend nationally in 2018 in real swing districts. This is solid R land where we are still making inroads. Still, think Ossoff is probably a little under a coinflip for the runoff.slugsrbad wrote:JUburton wrote:Romney won this district by like 20%. They held their nose to vote for Trump. The fact that Ossoff even has a chance against a normal Republican is good news.
I agree, but the head to head will be much harder to win. It is a Republican leaning district, and now the field is less scatterbrained. The results wasn't a win for either side. If Ossof would have had less than 40% he would have been in trouble, but where he ended wasn't as strong as a kick in the nuts as the Kansas result. The good thing, is that apparently Handel has a bad favorable rating in the district (for what that is worth).