You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Thread

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby Youseff » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:18:41

JUburton wrote:that whole yemen seal operation seems like it went very well! really hope this is just coincidence and not a new standard.


killed a bunch of women and kids. just like Obama.
This is what a real tenderoni likes to do for you

Youseff
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 22976
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 03:47:53
Location: Ice Mountain

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby JUburton » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:20:13

Youseff wrote:
JUburton wrote:that whole yemen seal operation seems like it went very well! really hope this is just coincidence and not a new standard.


killed a bunch of women and kids. just like Obama.
I don't know how tongue in cheek this is and I know drone strikes certainly had some share of collateral damage, this one seems a little more...personal? idk.

JUburton
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 17132
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 20:49:25
Location: Philly

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby jerseyhoya » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:22:46

slugsrbad wrote:
Luzinski's Gut wrote:A quick thought or two about the Yates firing.

I am in favor of it.

My opinion is that you don't want Executive Branch bureaucrats - regardless of what "rank" or status they possess - becoming the sole determiner of national policy or law. The Executive Branch bureaucracy is already a shadow fourth branch of our Federal government, and within that framework, precedent matters a great deal.

So in the future, if a new Democratic President had an acting Republican AG who acted in the same manner as Yates, I would fully the firing of the AG for the same exact reason as I stated above.

Yates' decision plays well within the political arena if one is against Trump. From a process and precedent perspective, Trump had no choice.


I defer to your wisdom on a lot of things that are just outside of my ken, but I disagree with your assertion of the Attorney General's role. Their duties, among others, are to represent the US in legal matters and to furnish advice and opinions on legal matters, as provided by law. If the Attorney General feels that a federal law is unconstitutional, then it is well within their purview to write a memo regarding that issue.

As it has been stated previously, the AG serves at the pleasure of the President. It has also been argued (mainly by Jack Goldsmith of Lawfare blog, posted by JH) that the AG did not make the case that the EO was illegal or that there were no reasonable defenses to the legality. This may be true, but I think that merely shifts the argument from Yates was well within her bounds, to Yates was well within her bounds to argue its legality, but failed to do so.

What this does truly boil down to is the incompetency of the Trump administration. Yates was to serve probably less than a week more until the feet dragging on Sessions ended. Instead, he passed this questionable EO with very little input from his advisors and relevant congresspeople, and passed it while there was an AG that was not of his choosing. Yates got to be a martyr for the left, and Trump once again looked incompetent.

I think this is mostly wrong.

The Trump administration has erred at almost every step along the way with the travel executive order - it's bad policy, it was poorly implemented, there was limited or no consultation with key stakeholders, once the flaws were apparent they have been slow to adapt, the usage of some Hill staff seems likely to further strain relations w/ Congress, etc etc. But they were absolutely right to fire Yates. She says the EO is not just or wise, which isn't really where the line gets drawn for the AG. She says in her letter the Office of Legal Counsel found it lawful on its face and doesn't say it's illegal or unconstitutional - just that she isn't convinced of its constitutionality. As someone who has worked in the Obama administration the past couple of years, one imagines she's been involved in defending plenty of policy she wasn't (or shouldn't have been) convinced was constitutional given the administration's track record in the courts. If she's asked to defend something that she believes to be illegal or unconstitutional, that's one thing, but not what happened here according to her.

I don't really think it makes a hell of a lot of difference if she resigned on principle or sends the letter knowing she'd get fired, but there was no way for her to remain in the job if she wasn't going to defend the order.

jerseyhoya
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 97408
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 21:56:17

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby traderdave » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:23:31

I don't give two shits how long Obama's DOE nominees spent testifying or how many questions they had to answer, I am concerned about THIS nominee. Alexander says he believes she is the most questioned DOE nominee in history; maybe that is because she is the most controversial and least qualified nominee.

traderdave
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 8451
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:44:01
Location: Here

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby pacino » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:28:20

Youseff wrote:
JUburton wrote:that whole yemen seal operation seems like it went very well! really hope this is just coincidence and not a new standard.


killed a bunch of women and kids. just like Obama.

fwiw, obama was never consulted on the first strike that killed the son. i'm not absolving him of approving other signature strikes (check my post history, i'm somewhat for drone strikes when we actually know the target but signature strikes seem pretty illegal to me) but this one wasn't quite the same.

Also, I doubt Donny boy was even consulted on this or weighed any consequences if he was. He probably hadn't heard of Yemen before this past week.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby JFLNYC » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:34:14

traderdave wrote:I don't give two shits how long Obama's DOE nominees spent testifying or how many questions they had to answer, I am concerned about THIS nominee. Alexander says he believes she is the most questioned DOE nominee in history; maybe that is because she is the most controversial and least qualified nominee.


First of all, if the point is she's the most questioned ever, the response is: "So what?"

Secondly, I'm sick and tired already of this administration's cynical invoking how things were done by Obama as a defense. You want to go back to those rules? Fine, no consideration of a new SC justice. No immigration reform. No new infrastructure, etc.

To paraphrase Bannon & Spicer: If you don't like how the game is being played just shut your mouth or resign.
Jamie

"A man who tells lies . . . merely hides the truth. But a man who tells half-lies has forgotten where he put it."

JFLNYC
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 34322
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 13:16:48
Location: Location, Location!

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby drsmooth » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:43:45

jerseyhoya wrote:there was no way for her to remain in the job if she wasn't going to defend the order.


at least a few professional observers have suggested this operatic firing wasn't necessary in the circumstances, which seems like it would feel right to anyone who's spent any time in personnel decisionmaking roles in any enterprise of any kind.

Sure, the impulse to fire is real, as is the authority to do so. But "no way for her to remain"? No.

I'm too lazy/busy right now to round up sources for you, sorry.
Yes, but in a double utley you can put your utley on top they other guy's utley, and you're the winner. (Swish)

drsmooth
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 47349
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 19:24:48
Location: Low station

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby JUburton » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:46:05

I don't blame yates for taking the stand and I don't blame Trump for firing her. It's all a moot point since shitass sessions is obviously going to be confirmed.

JUburton
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 17132
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 20:49:25
Location: Philly

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby The Nightman Cometh » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:48:09

I haven't been following this thread, has this circus brought JH to the light yet?
The Nightman Cometh
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 8553
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 14:35:45

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby thephan » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:49:17

JH is right. The AG's job is not a gut check but constitutional and legal assessment. The flawed policy was backed up with horrific implementation driven by confusion, misunderstanding, making it up, and maybe some malice. I assume Yates knew what she was doing and what the outcome would be. As a public service announcement, the last time that there was such a public debasing of an AG it led to Nixon's impeachment. That was different then this, but the opening beat of this song is the same.
yawn

thephan
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 18749
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 15:25:25
Location: LOCKDOWN

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby thephan » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:51:21

The Nightman Cometh wrote:I haven't been following this thread, has this circus brought JH to the light yet?


That would assume that he has been in the dark. I think he has been very transparent that he disagrees with the actions of the administration and the betrayal of the people pretending to be part of the GOP. If you are looking for conversion, then that would take something else. He is a good Republican dealing with a lot of bad faith invaders.
yawn

thephan
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 18749
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 15:25:25
Location: LOCKDOWN

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby pacino » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:52:48

having executive power expanded is a bad thing, but Congress has completely abdicated its role for years. It appears they've decided to double-down on that. At this point if you don't take the gun away from the toddler, it's one you.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby The Nightman Cometh » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:58:40

thephan wrote:
The Nightman Cometh wrote:I haven't been following this thread, has this circus brought JH to the light yet?


That would assume that he has been in the dark. I think he has been very transparent that he disagrees with the actions of the administration and the betrayal of the people pretending to be part of the GOP. If you are looking for conversion, then that would take something else. He is a good Republican dealing with a lot of bad faith invaders.

I would prefer he was a democrat and the lines between the parties have arguably never been more blurred than now. I have a seat saved for him on the Dem bus.
The Nightman Cometh
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 8553
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 14:35:45

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby JUburton » Tue Jan 31, 2017 11:58:53

Dems currently boycotting committee votes for Mnuchin and Price. Can't go to full Senate.

JUburton
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 17132
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 20:49:25
Location: Philly

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby TomatoPie » Tue Jan 31, 2017 12:00:18

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/01/31/o ... austs.html

it’s becoming increasingly clear that the aroma of bigotry infuses the whole operation, and anybody who aligns too closely will end up sharing in the stench.
Kill the chicken to scare the monkey

TomatoPie
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 5184
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2007 22:18:10
Location: Delaware Valley

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby pacino » Tue Jan 31, 2017 12:04:20

The Nightman Cometh wrote:
thephan wrote:
The Nightman Cometh wrote:I haven't been following this thread, has this circus brought JH to the light yet?


That would assume that he has been in the dark. I think he has been very transparent that he disagrees with the actions of the administration and the betrayal of the people pretending to be part of the GOP. If you are looking for conversion, then that would take something else. He is a good Republican dealing with a lot of bad faith invaders.

I would prefer he was a democrat and the lines between the parties have arguably never been more blurred than now. I have a seat saved for him on the Dem bus.

no, he should fight for his own party. we don't hold the same views on governing, i'm not sure why he should join the Democratic Party. He should try to wrestle his party back from the crazies and help push the impotent, feckless republican leadership to turn on Trump for the good of the nation. jh doesn't fit in the D party, as he would probably acknowledge.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby The Nightman Cometh » Tue Jan 31, 2017 12:05:35

If JH moved to the left on labor laws he'd be at least as good of a democrat as 3 sitting senators.
The Nightman Cometh
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 8553
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 14:35:45

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby Youseff » Tue Jan 31, 2017 12:07:23

Luzinski's Gut wrote:
The Nightman Cometh wrote:I disagree with your characterization of the travel ban as a minor issue, LG.


We did the same thing under the last two administrations.

My opinion: the admin has not provided the context on why this is so important that it was rammed through in an EO. There's plenty of solid logic why, resident in the Intel world. That's why the Obama administration created the tougher visa standards.

After 90 days, if nothing has changed, then I become much more concerned.

But I am not looking to change anyone's opinion. I can't. We're too polarized. Trying to maintain any sense of logic and objectivity is impossible today. I have friends who literally believe they are going to be deported because they are third generation Lebanese Americans.


I don't think it's fair to compare this ban to what's transpired or been proposed in the last 16 years. I think it's right for the populace to object, for the ACLU to interject, because contextually the purpose of the ban seems less about safety and strategy and more about ethno-purity of the intellectual class (see Bannon's comments on this), rallying the more xenophobic part of the base while protecting the president's I thought illegal conflicts of interest, and as you've eluded to creating a diversionary tactic. order through chaos.
This is what a real tenderoni likes to do for you

Youseff
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 22976
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 03:47:53
Location: Ice Mountain

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby Gimpy » Tue Jan 31, 2017 12:12:00

Image

Gimpy
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 15670
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 19:11:47

Re: You Get an Executive Order and You Get: A Politics Threa

Unread postby slugsrbad » Tue Jan 31, 2017 12:17:18

All I learned from the Nightman/Pac exchange is that JH is the protagonist of a RPG and it's on him to fulfill his destiny.
Quick Google shows that GoGo is wrong with regards to the Kiwi and the Banana.

Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?

slugsrbad
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 27586
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 15:52:49

PreviousNext