Super Bowl MVP QB Nick Foles

by **joe table** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 16:25:44

But when the fullness of the time came, Dug sent forth His Son Folez, born of a woman, born under the Law, so that He might redeem those who were under the Law, that we might receive the adoption as sons. Because you are sons, Dug has sent forth the Spirit of His Son into our hearts, crying, "Abba! Father! 4 verts!" (Galatians 4:4-7)

by **Eem** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 16:32:02

Foles is gonna win the Super Bowl, Howie is gonna get a 2 from Arizona, they're going to trade down from #32 for a 2 and a 3, and we're gonna be loaded in this draft

GO BIIIIIIIRRRRDS *head waggle*

by **Gimpy** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 16:42:23

If Foles completes 75% of his passes and throws another three TDs with no interceptions in a win, he’ll fetch a first. I’d also hate to see him move on after winning us a fucking Super Bowl, but it would be best for the franchise going forward.

by **Doll Is Mine** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 16:42:36

Nick Foles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sam Bradford

by **Eem** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 16:43:50

Gimpy wrote:If Foles completes 75% of his passes and throws another three TDs with no interceptions in a win, he’ll fetch a first. I’d also hate to see him move on after winning us a fucking Super Bowl, but it would be best for the franchise going forward.

Oh yeah, you HAVE to trade him.

by **Squire** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 16:50:44

Really really don't think anybody is giving up a 1st for a 29 year old QB with Foles' pedigree no matter what he does in 2 weeks. You either have QB of the future or you are looking for someone 25 or younger.

by **Eem** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 16:52:32

Squire wrote:Really really don't think anybody is giving up a 1st for a 29 year old QB with Foles' pedigree no matter what he does in 2 weeks. You either have QB of the future or you are looking for someone 25 or younger.

I kinda lean this way. It may be a 2 with an incentivized second pick somewhere. I do know Roseman will be aggressive in trying to move him.

by **Woody** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 16:54:19

Squire wrote:Really really don't think anybody is giving up a 1st for a 29 year old QB with Foles' pedigree no matter what he does in 2 weeks. You either have QB of the future or you are looking for someone 25 or younger.

[Reveal] Spoiler:

by **pacino** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 16:55:51

are we sure the guy won't just retire

by **Grotewold** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 16:58:32

pacino wrote:are we sure the guy won't just retire

that would be baller, but not at $7M+

by **Bill McNeal** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 17:37:41

Squire wrote:Really really don't think anybody is giving up a 1st for a 29 year old QB with Foles' pedigree no matter what he does in 2 weeks. You either have QB of the future or you are looking for someone 25 or younger.

Probably wouldn't give up a first for Foles, but wouldn't a team like Denver be a good fit potentially? They should still have a good defense and have no competent QBs at all. Foles is only signed through next year at 9 mil so you can be flexible there too. I have no idea how to value that in the trade market though.

by **Gimpy** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 17:41:45

I’d like to see Howie have a set price before the draft where if the offers he gets aren’t high enough he pulls a Bradford and just holds onto him and waits for a team to need a QB.

by **Gimpy** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 17:44:38

Squire wrote:Really really don't think anybody is giving up a 1st for a 29 year old QB with Foles' pedigree no matter what he does in 2 weeks. You either have QB of the future or you are looking for someone 25 or younger.

He’s been damn good in three career playoff games and that hypothetical involves him being dominant in a SB win over Belichick’s Pats. I don’t think underperforming coming in cold in a couple of meaningless 0 degree regular season games will impact his value that much.

by **Squire** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 17:49:14

Given that Wentz is coming off an ACL+ and we have a Super Bowl Calibre team, I'm not convinced he's not just more valuable to us.

by **PSUPhilliesPhan** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 17:50:47

Squire wrote:Really really don't think anybody is giving up a 1st for a 29 year old QB with Foles' pedigree no matter what he does in 2 weeks. You either have QB of the future or you are looking for someone 25 or younger.

Agreed, maybe a 2 and a conditional pick in 2019. The 49ers got a very high 2nd rounder (#34) and a conditional pick the following year for Alex Smith. Smith was also heading into his age 29 season with one year left on his contract. The conditional pick ended up as a 2 (Chiefs finishing with winning record made it a 2 not a 3). Jags, Bills, Cardinals and Broncos make the most sense as none are in official rebuild mode. Maybe you could get that high 2nd rounder from the Jets too if they can't get a QB at #6.

by **PTOITWCFTPP** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 17:53:07

Squire wrote:Given that Wentz is coming off an ACL+ and we have a Super Bowl Calibre team, I'm not convinced he's not just more valuable to us.

Amen

by **MoBettle** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 17:54:10

The best plan might be a combo. Keep him until you know Wentz is healthy, which is probably camp, then deal him to a team whose QB gets hurt.

by **Eem** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 17:55:27

Fuck that, trade him for everything you can get, and sign a guy like Tyrod Taylor to back up Wentz in the event Wentz isn't ready

by **stevemc** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 17:58:53

Eem wrote:#$!&@ that, trade him for everything you can get, and sign a guy like Tyrod Taylor to back up Wentz in the event Wentz isn't ready

Sudfeld!!!!

by **Woody** » Tue Jan 23, 2018 17:59:10

Right. As much as he's our baby he's basically replacement level and if you need to go with your backup you're not going to win the Super B -- DAMMIT. how did we get here?

Archived

Super Bowl MVP QB Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Re: Nick Foles

Quick Reply