jerseyhoya wrote:My hatred of quote boxes in signatures has reached a new high
Polar Bear Phan wrote:Braves fans apparently just randomly raise their arms to the sky.
Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?
Slowhand wrote:Too lazy to look for the reason myself, but why the heck are they building a new stadium? Turner Field isn't that old.
Additionally, the mixed-use development will fundamentally change many of our fans game day behaviors. Some will be interested in shopping and dining before the game, while others may stay later after the final out is recorded.
BigEd76 wrote:The stadium was built for the '96 Olympics and was modified to handle baseball, and the lease runs out in 2016. Schuerholz said it would take $150M for maintenance and $200M to improve the fan experience. They also did studies that said most of the Barves fans don't live near the stadium, the nearest train station is 3/4 mile away, car traffic is awful, and they can't control the supporting stuff (restaurants, hotels, bars, etc.) surrounding the area, so they're putting a new park close to I-75/I-285 in what they claim is the center of the fan base. The new place is gonna have 8,000 less seats so it won't look as empty, and it's gonna have less parking onsite but they'll be able to use adjacent parking lots and shuttles, so the 6,000 onsite parking spots will actually be 30,000 within a 2-mile radius
slugsrbad wrote:apparently the maintenance cost for Turner is expensive and needed, and in the long run a new stadium would be cheaper. Also transportation issues, also #$!&@ them.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:slugsrbad wrote:apparently the maintenance cost for Turner is expensive and needed, and in the long run a new stadium would be cheaper. Also transportation issues, also #$!&@ them.
this creates far more transport issues than staying at Turner or rehabbing it.
.
swishnicholson wrote:BigEd76 wrote:The stadium was built for the '96 Olympics and was modified to handle baseball, and the lease runs out in 2016. Schuerholz said it would take $150M for maintenance and $200M to improve the fan experience. They also did studies that said most of the Barves fans don't live near the stadium, the nearest train station is 3/4 mile away, car traffic is awful, and they can't control the supporting stuff (restaurants, hotels, bars, etc.) surrounding the area, so they're putting a new park close to I-75/I-285 in what they claim is the center of the fan base. The new place is gonna have 8,000 less seats so it won't look as empty, and it's gonna have less parking onsite but they'll be able to use adjacent parking lots and shuttles, so the 6,000 onsite parking spots will actually be 30,000 within a 2-mile radius
Some of that is true, but a lot of it is rationalization. The main thing is that the stadium and surrounding area will be controlled by the Braves rather than being simply tenants, even though much of the money is coming from public sources. In other words, they can make a lot more money in a stadium of their own. Which is of course their right, but it doesn't mean the whole thing can't seem distasteful. One thing Cobb County had to guarantee to residents in order to win approval was that an extension of the public rail system would NOT be created to reach the stadium. Certainly don't want any of those city residents showing up to darken their doors.
- Joe Dendy, chairman of Cobb Co Republican party"It is absolutely necessary the solution is all about moving cars in and around Cobb and surrounding counties from our north and east where most Braves fans travel from, and not moving people into Cobb by rail from Atlanta."
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.