ek wrote:

ReadingPhilly wrote:14-2 should still be good enough for home field.

prolly yea. as long as they don't play here, I'm good

You seen the Vikings schedule

ReadingPhilly wrote:14-2 should still be good enough for home field.

Who are the Vikings losing to.

Bad: They lose.
Good: I don't have to hear anymore about how invincibly great they are.

prob some shitty team like the eagles are doing tonight.

Squire wrote:Gambled and lost. I don't blame them though with the refs calling pass interference on every other play

Yeah, Seattle’s d lives on contact in the secondary and no calls are going against them but we are getting everything called against us.

That was the 2 yard line

Have we ever beaten Wilson? 0-2 right?

Dont wanna be that guy but the only thing that will stop the eagles are the refs. Seahawks should have already punted the ball but nooooo.

Warszawa wrote:That was the 2 yard line

Foot is at the 2, ball was around the 1

they just killed davis

That looked dangerous

Girooski wrote:Dont wanna be that guy but the only thing that will stop the eagles are the refs. Seahawks should have already punted the ball but nooooo.

Did you miss the Darby non-penalty?

Seattle ball now at the 1
1st and goal: incomplete pass
2nd and goal: Davis hit for no gain
3rd and goal: touchdown pass to Lockett

Balls

Well that wasted a minute

Another clear hold in the middle of the line

Let's see how they respond

XP is good

17-3 Seattle

Wilson's throws against his body with the laziest throws and gets away with it

To the question above of Who are the Vikings losing to? I don't know, they play an 8-4 team next week and the Packers at Lambeau wouldn't be easy if the Pack were 14-0 or 0-14.