JFLNYC wrote:702 wrote:Slowhand wrote:702 wrote:JFLNYC wrote:NYT has had Trump at 59% for last 30 minutes or so.
Updated to 61%!
63%
66!
68
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
jamiethekiller wrote:she shoulda probably campaigned in rural areas instead of comign to fucking philadelphia every fucking week
JFLNYC wrote:JFLNYC wrote:702 wrote:Slowhand wrote:702 wrote:JFLNYC wrote:NYT has had Trump at 59% for last 30 minutes or so.
Updated to 61%!
63%
66!
68
73.
I may literally weep.
Bill McNeal wrote:I don't know what to say if we as a country elect him. I get that Hillary is not without her warts, but for fucks sake, this guy is a horrible man, we will be a laughing stock of the world if we elect this guy
Slowhand wrote:pacino wrote:Need PA and Michigan and NH or Nevada...based off Clinton insider. They 'feel good' about it.
Guess that's where they're doing the rigging. Phew!
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
702 wrote:Slowhand wrote:pacino wrote:Need PA and Michigan and NH or Nevada...based off Clinton insider. They 'feel good' about it.
Guess that's where they're doing the rigging. Phew!
There were numerous accounts of the booths in Vegas autocorrecting votes to Hilary when pressing Trump.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
jamiethekiller wrote:and major cities were always goign to vote for Hillary. you gotta get swing votes somehow.
Gimpy wrote:Maybe some fault lies with the democrats for nominating the least likable person in their party for a general election?
Nah, it's probably just because of racists and white people and Jill Stein voters.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
td11 wrote:jamiethekiller wrote:and major cities were always goign to vote for Hillary. you gotta get swing votes somehow.
Those aren't swing votes
Gimpy wrote:Maybe some fault lies with the democrats for nominating the least likable person in their party for a general election?