Youseff wrote:the Bill Clinton Jeffrey Epstein stuff is pretty real. Bill hung out with him on flights to places with sex tourism. Epstein is a convicted pedo.

So did Trump. Hence the reason that Trump actually has a lawsuit pending, brought by an alleged victim.

Clinton doesn't.

you think I'm in this thread to defend Trump or something?

You're jumping through about 10 miles worth of hoops to get to comparing Hillary to Sandusky's wife.

Youseff wrote:you think I'm in this thread to defend Trump or something?

No I'm an attorney. I'm skeptical by nature. There's no reason that one rich famous person would have allegations and lawsuits but the even more famous but less rich person would not if they're both doing the same misdeeds.

So the only logical conclusion for me is that Clinton isnt living down to his reputation anymore. There's just no way he could've stayed under the radar for the past two decades.

the Epstein stuff is like 13 years ago.

"only logical conclusion"

So this guy went from undecided to decided after the debate. He's with her.

“I thought it was initially it was going to be a great atmosphere,” Johnson said.

As he watched Trump’s behavior toward Clinton as she spoke to the audience, he grew more and more uncomfortable.

“He walked around her, sat behind her, and almost like he was stalking her,” he said of Trump’s body language.

“It was a lot of weird and it was very creepy,” he added.

He also mentioned that another person in the audience whispered, “He’s weird… Why is he doing that?”

not that I 100% believe the Epstein stuff, but it does seem to be that guy's modus operandi to be a pedo much of the time, and Bill hung out with him a lot. truth, especially in politics, is objective. what's more important to people is winning both literally but also the narrative. I think Trump supporters are generally stupider than people in this thread, but the rational they use to validate their vote doesn't seem that different from some of y'all.

Youseff wrote:"only logical conclusion"

"For me"

I can certainly be persuaded otherwise...if there's actual evidence. But you're jumping at shadows here.

Youseff wrote:I don't think love is a good excuse for covering up for sexual and sticking with a serial predator.

When the Lewinsky scandal broke, and dragged on, I came to the view that Clinton should resign; for the country's good, for his family's good, for his wife's good, for his own good. I took inspiration from this guy.

I still feel that's what he should have done. And plenty of evidence is in; Bill Clinton has not treated women well, and while some forms of punishment have been doled out, they've likely been too light for the pain he's inflicted.

Hillary is & was married to the guy. She wasn't rolling his condoms (or cigars) for him. She damn well hasn't done so since.

I don't know if he loves her, or she him. But love is not an excuse for anything. Love is its own thing. It's like a separate thing. Supposedly there was this guy a long time ago who died because of love. Love for practically every scurvy instance of human then crawling the planet. Unconditional love is what it's called sometimes. That means 'without conditions'. So you can't help it. And you can't hurt it. You have nothing to do with it.

People haven't gotten a lot less scurvy, and there's a lot more of us. Love is a motherfucker.

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

Youseff wrote:"only logical conclusion"

"For me"

I can certainly be persuaded otherwise...if there's actual evidence. But you're jumping at shadows here.

you want me to google all the stories that have been out since he got convicted and then copy and paste it for you? crikey. make sure you're never my attorney with that work ethic.

Doll Is Mine wrote:So Curt Schilling just asked a female FOX host if she's fantasized about someone else's son in order to defend Trump's comments about that 10-year old girl.

This from a guy who went ape shit hunting down guys like Trump who posted lewd comments about Schilling's daughter on Twitter.

drsmooth wrote:

Youseff wrote:I don't think love is a good excuse for covering up for sexual and sticking with a serial predator.

When the Lewinsky scandal broke, and dragged on, I came to the view that Clinton should resign; for the country's good, for his family's good, for his wife's good, for his own good. I took inspiration from this guy.

I still feel that's what he should have done. And plenty of evidence is in; Bill Clinton has not treated women well, and while some forms of punishment have been doled out, they've likely been too light for the pain he's inflicted.

Hillary is & was married to the guy. She wasn't rolling his condoms (or cigars) for him. She damn well hasn't done so since.

I don't know if he loves her, or she him. But love is not an excuse for anything. Love is its own thing. It's like a separate thing. Supposedly there was this guy a long time ago who died because of love. Love for practically every scurvy instance of human then crawling the planet. Unconditional love is what it's called sometimes. That means 'without conditions'. So you can't help it. And you can't hurt it. You have nothing to do with it.

People haven't gotten a lot less scurvy, and there's a lot more of us. Love is a motherfucker.

Agree with what you're saying if we're dealing with infidelity. Some relationships have room for that, in various types of agreements. I'm admittedly dealing in hypotheticals inspired by the Anon stuff, but also stuff like Juanita Broederick and the other women from that era, as well as all the Jeffrey Epstein stuff. That's where she becomes a villainous type.

Youseff wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

Youseff wrote:"only logical conclusion"

"For me"

I can certainly be persuaded otherwise...if there's actual evidence. But you're jumping at shadows here.

you want me to google all the stories that have been out since he got convicted and then copy and paste it for you? crikey. make sure you're never my attorney with that work ethic.

Of whom? Clinton?

What the fuck are you even talking about?

You really don't think that Trump, Bannon, Alex Jones, Hannity, et al., aren't moving heaven and earth to find newer stuff on him? And haven't been for years?

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

Youseff wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

Youseff wrote:"only logical conclusion"

"For me"

I can certainly be persuaded otherwise...if there's actual evidence. But you're jumping at shadows here.

you want me to google all the stories that have been out since he got convicted and then copy and paste it for you? crikey. make sure you're never my attorney with that work ethic.

Of whom? Clinton?

What the fuck are you even talking about?

are you drinking bud? If you read what I've wrote I'm clearly talking about Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein, as well as his other sexual transgressions.

I called this 10 months ago.

viewtopic.php_f=2&t=16925&p=2293464&hilit=epstein#p2293464

my record for this election cycle is spotless.

Youseff wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

Youseff wrote:

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

Youseff wrote:"only logical conclusion"

"For me"

I can certainly be persuaded otherwise...if there's actual evidence. But you're jumping at shadows here.

you want me to google all the stories that have been out since he got convicted and then copy and paste it for you? crikey. make sure you're never my attorney with that work ethic.

Of whom? Clinton?

What the #$!&@ are you even talking about?

are you drinking bud? If you read what I've wrote I'm clearly talking about Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein, as well as his other sexual transgressions.

Don't be an asshole.

So "he" is Epstein then. Your post was borderline imcoherent.

There are stories about the two of them together but nothing specific. Bud.

when you type in a message board one of the benefits is the thread that came before it. the thread creates the context, and each subsequent post doesn't need to reestablish what you've been discussing. when I watch minute 89 of Rear Window, I don't need to understand why Grace Kelly is in love with Jimmy Stewart, the earlier parts of the movie established that.

I hope Hillary will prove she isn't a pedophile enabler as soon as rpf proves he isn't beating his wife.

If there's actual proof of some big coverup by Hillary of some rape of a 13 yr old by Bill then show it. Otherwise? I'm done with this shit. hypotheticals are bullshit. If there's proof, fine.