karn wrote:It's more or less obvious that Fox intentionally set out to diminish Trump by only posing personal, attacking questions. Really petty regardless of how you feel about the man. Won't hurt his numbers but they're definitely intent on not helping him

wow

karn wrote:It's more or less obvious that Fox intentionally set out to diminish Trump by only posing personal, attacking questions. Really petty regardless of how you feel about the man. Won't hurt his numbers but they're definitely intent on not helping him

it's actually pretty obvious IMO. I think we may be the only two seeing it this way, though.

regardless, these buffoons are just diminishing themselves. watch their positive ratings skyrocket.

I have a gay friend. Hell yeah.

hey guys, i know a few gay people. i disagree with the idea that they're gay but boy are they friendly!

"We've always loved and supported gay people"

- Republicans

all night Kasich seems like a fine fellow.

They've only asked Trump questions about things he's said that relate to issues under consideration. With him, they don't have much else to work with; he's never governed. He's never held office. How is that petty?

"When the government evades the church..."

uhh...isn't that the point?

drsmooth wrote:

karn wrote:It's more or less obvious that Fox intentionally set out to diminish Trump by only posing personal, attacking questions. Really petty regardless of how you feel about the man. Won't hurt his numbers but they're definitely intent on not helping him

wow

He has yet to be asked a serious, non-personal policy question? From the bell it has been an attacking onslaught. I don't feel one way or another about him besides intrigued and having followed the entire field closely can say that he's said a lot of useful things that aren't even being given a chance to be repeated here as his entire time is being spent defending himself. Again, that's an observation that has no relevancy to what you think of him

drsmooth wrote:They've only asked Trump questions about things he's said that relate to issues under consideration. With him, they don't have much else to work with; he's never governed. He's never held office. How is that petty?

they've ignored a lot of things people've said (Huckabee and Hitler, Walker and relating unions to ISIS, etc etc) Trump, and Carson honestly, they are going for the jugular looking to humiliate

drsmooth wrote:They've only asked Trump questions about things he's said that relate to issues under consideration. With him, they don't have much else to work with; he's never governed. He's never held office. How is that petty?

He just had a huge poll showing that 40+% think he would best handle the economy and their question during the economic portion was about why he used useful bankruptcy laws when it was prudent to do so. I am genuinely interested to hear what ideas he has to grow the economy as a wildly successful businessman

Youseff wrote:all night Kasich seems like a fine fellow.

it is a bit 'i have a gay friend!' and i believe him but he still votes against same sex marriage, and gay adoption.

Trump cannot effectively piss on anyone else's leg here. And leg-pissing is one of his strengths. He hasn't pissed on his own leg, visibly, yet, but this is not a yuge evening for him

karn wrote:

drsmooth wrote:They've only asked Trump questions about things he's said that relate to issues under consideration. With him, they don't have much else to work with; he's never governed. He's never held office. How is that petty?

He just had a huge poll showing that 40+% think he would best handle the economy and their question during the economic portion was about why he used useful bankruptcy laws when it was prudent to do so. I am genuinely interested to hear what ideas he has to grow the economy as a wildly successful businessman

sell the USA name and put it on a lot of products

karn wrote: I am genuinely interested to hear what ideas he has to grow the economy as a wildly successful businessman

He doesn't have any

JUburton wrote:

Youseff wrote:all night Kasich seems like a fine fellow.

it is a bit 'i have a gay friend!' and i believe him but he still votes against same sex marriage, and gay adoption.

gay people are cool but they don't deserve all of the same rights.

it's pointless to be 'nice' when also legislating against equality

They asked him a policy question about immigration and he ignored talking about whatever evidence he claims he has to base his policy off of.

pacino wrote:

JUburton wrote:

Youseff wrote:all night Kasich seems like a fine fellow.

it is a bit 'i have a gay friend!' and i believe him but he still votes against same sex marriage, and gay adoption.

gay people are cool but they don't deserve all of the same rights.

it's pointless to be 'nice' when also legislating against equality

yeah id assume if it wasnt legal and his friends couldnt get married in his state as a direct result of his pen, theyd go tell him to fuck himself.

it's pretty well-known that Clinton would've done things differently if she were leading American foreign policy in the 1st term; it's funny how this is the Obama-Clinton foreign policy now, though.