phatj wrote:Different faults. The Cascadia fault runs just offshore of the west coast from northern California all the way to BC. It has been basically totally stuck for 300+ years, no little pressure-relief earthquakes at all. It's ~75 years overdue based on historical averages.
Monkeyboy wrote:phatj wrote:Monkeyboy wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/07/20/the-really-big-one
RIP smitty
good read. I saw a special on that about 7-8 years ago. I still want to move there, but it's hard to find the sweet spot where you are far enough east that you avoid the danger areas while still being far enough west that you get enough rain and access to the beaches.
I was looking just east and west of the Portland area.
Stay on the inland side of the coast range and you might avoid getting wiped out by the tsunami at least.
I think I'll find the inundation maps and look at them before buying anything. Also gotta watch out for volcanos. I have several other requirements that make finding something difficult. I may go out next summer to look at the area more closely.
SK790 wrote:phatj wrote:Different faults. The Cascadia fault runs just offshore of the west coast from northern California all the way to BC. It has been basically totally stuck for 300+ years, no little pressure-relief earthquakes at all. It's ~75 years overdue based on historical averages.
Oddly enough everywhere west of the Cascades will be fine if Yellowstone blows (probably one of the best places in the northern hemisphere to be, tbh). The Cascadia fault scares the #$!&@ out of me, tho. Oregon had some small earthquakes lately. Hopefully it's not indicative of anything.
CalvinBall wrote:People on motorcycles can be real dicks. Weaving in and out of traffic. Flying by on the shoulder. Probably deserved to get punched.
PTOITWCFTPP wrote:Got way too excited pulling into Wawa in Virginia