Bill McNeal wrote:I remember back when I was single, there was this girl I worked with who asked me if I wanted to hang out. I agreed and picked her up at her apt. Before we went out, I used her bathroom. While taking a leak, I saw there was a big ball of girl pubes floating on top of the trash can in her bathroom. I thought I was going to have sex that night, and sure enough, I did.
Bucky wrote:i'm going with caucasian
Slowhand wrote:I've been sweating profusely in my sleep for weeks now. Like every night. And it doesn't matter what the temperature in my room is either. Really gross. Is this AIDS?
Youseff wrote:
this is a picture from a sex club in San Francisco. so the question is are all sex club attendees this awful?
Slowhand wrote:Fell asleep in the middle of a beej last night. Don't think she noticed.
In October 2012, Dougherty sued over a comment posted two months earlier on a Daily News blog that described a public feud involving Dougherty. The comment identified Dougherty by his well-known nickname, "Johnny Doc," and called him "the pedophile."
Dougherty sued the anonymous poster, and his lawyers subpoenaed Philadelphia Media Network, Philly.com's parent company, to supply the person's identity.
Mark Block, a spokesman for Interstate General Media, corporate parent of PMN, referred all questions to Eli Segal, an attorney for the company.
Segal said that after receiving the subpoena, the company contacted the anonymous poster to make sure he or she got notice of the lawsuit and hired a lawyer. He said lawyers for Dougherty and the person who posted the comment presented their arguments to Common Pleas Court Judge Jacqueline F. Allen.
On Feb. 26, Allen ordered the news company to disclose the poster's identity, along with any comments he or she posted from Aug. 10, 2012, through this January.
According to court filings, Dougherty's lawyers had sent a subpoena to PMN requesting that the company reveal the poster's identity. A lawyer for the company said it would not do so without a court order.
Philip L. Blackman, a lawyer for the person who posted the comment, could not be reached. In court filings, he argued that his client's comments were protected by the First Amendment. Blackman said the description of Dougherty was not "defamatory per se."
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.