Roger Dorn wrote:As a registered Republican the election results have me smiling from ear to ear. The Party needs a wakeup call, and sooner rather than later. The Party of "small-government" is the biggest farce going. Last time I checked, small government does not entail starting two undeclared wars that have brought up astronomical debt and loss of life. Small government does not entail encroaching on personal life decisions such as advocating for a constitutional amendment defining marriage and overturning Roe v. Wade. Small government does not needlessly spend money combating a useless drug war.

The Republican Party is run by imbeciles and I will continue to laugh at them until they realize they need to stop this religious centric bullshit. This Party is not conservative and doesn't stand for conservative ideals whatsoever.

Doll Is Mine wrote:

pacino wrote:uh oh, a Hindu! that guy was so right. First the muslims, then the buddhists, now the hindus. A guy in California is in a count and recount situation, so maybe two

Conservapedia wrote:Dogs are known for their loyalty, making them one of the most conservative pets. Dogs represent Real America; they are often found on farms in red states and not in cities, where liberal apartment rental agreements often prevent renters from having dogs. Dogs are an important part of family values, as the quintessential American family is often featured with a dog. Dogs also are often used to search out Muslim terrorists, serving America honorably in the army and police forces across the county.

Compared with lazy, entitled cats, dogs represent the epitome of a conservative animal. Historically, dogs earned their role in the home through hard work herding animals and assisting men with hunting. Cats, on the other hand, were worshiped as false idols in ancient societies and do little to earn their keep in the home. Liberals often use dogs to their political advantage - Barack Hussein Obama keeps a dog in the White House. This is clearly a liberal ploy to win over dog owners in crucial swing states. In reality no true dog would voluntarily be a part of the liberal propaganda machine, especially given how many liberals are atheist and the proven link between atheism and bestiality.

pacino wrote:she'll be 3 years older than romney is now. i dont see the big deal. mccain was 70 when he ran

TenuredVulture wrote:I think E. Warren is tough--she's obviously got plenty of domestic policy experience, but in 2016, she'll only have 2/3 of a Senate term as far as elected office goes. One knock on Obama was not even a full Senate term, and to some extent, I think that lack of experience was a handicap. And, she'll be 67. So, old and inexperienced. Not a great combo.

TenuredVulture wrote:I think E. Warren is tough--she's obviously got plenty of domestic policy experience, but in 2016, she'll only have 2/3 of a Senate term as far as elected office goes. One knock on Obama was not even a full Senate term, and to some extent, I think that lack of experience was a handicap. And, she'll be 67. So, old and inexperienced. Not a great combo.

TenuredVulture wrote:Yeah, I think Palin very well could go for the R nomination in 2016.

mozartpc27 wrote:

TenuredVulture wrote:Yeah, I think Palin very well could go for the R nomination in 2016.

I'll say it: not a chance. I think she is more into being a TV star than a politician tbh.