jeff2sf wrote:Argh, lost my post...
As a guy in the center, I'm, obviously, pretty happy with Obama. Re:torture, what was he supposed to do? Send Cheney over to the Hague? Release the Gitmo people into the wild with an apology? This is complicated stuff. He stopped the bleeding, we're not going to do it again (under his watch) and that's about all the political capital he can spend on this right now. The pro-torturers are mad, the anti-torturers don't think he went far enough... usually that means the guy got it just right.
Re: executive powers, yeah I wish he'd relinquish every single thing Bush took over, but let's not make it sound like he's writing signing statements on every bill and talking about how he's the decider. He's the guy who's been criticized for being too deferential to Congress.
I wanted some sanity put back into the process, even if I didn't always agree with decisions made by the President, and darn it, he's nailing it.
Rococo4 wrote:No, being happy with A president doesnt make one liberal (or conservative for that matter) but being happy with THIS president, along with the other statements re: bush executive powers, quoting al franken, does not put one in the political center
for the record, i am getting poorer and poorer by the day, but i still cant envison a scenario where it leads me to voting for a Democrat
jeff2sf wrote:Rococo4 wrote:No, being happy with A president doesnt make one liberal (or conservative for that matter) but being happy with THIS president, along with the other statements re: bush executive powers, quoting al franken, does not put one in the political center
for the record, i am getting poorer and poorer by the day, but i still cant envison a scenario where it leads me to voting for a Democrat
I know, sooner or later we've gotta start voting our interests, rocco my boy. Unless you think it's your dumbassery that has you unemployed.
I didn't quote Al Franken, I don't know any of his lines except "Gosh darn it people like me".
jeff2sf wrote:I should point out here, lest smoothie accuses me of being flip, that I'm sure the job loss was no fault of your own, that I know being unemployed sucks, and that I hope you get a job tomorrow.
jeff2sf wrote:I know bro, whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger, personal responsibility and all that. Yay team. (remember, I learned all of the Republican code, I'm an MBA after all).
Rococo4 wrote:jeff2sf wrote:Rococo4 wrote:No, being happy with A president doesnt make one liberal (or conservative for that matter) but being happy with THIS president, along with the other statements re: bush executive powers, quoting al franken, does not put one in the political center
for the record, i am getting poorer and poorer by the day, but i still cant envison a scenario where it leads me to voting for a Democrat
I know, sooner or later we've gotta start voting our interests, rocco my boy. Unless you think it's your dumbassery that has you unemployed.
I didn't quote Al Franken, I don't know any of his lines except "Gosh darn it people like me".
There are more important things to me in voting than how much money i make...but i dont really accept the notion that if I am poor that voting for Democrats will help me. That is what they want me to think, of course.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
jeff2sf wrote:I should point out here, lest smoothie accuses me of being flip, that I'm sure the job loss was no fault of your own, that I know being unemployed sucks, and that I hope you get a job tomorrow.
The populist tendency has always used the same sort of rhetoric: for the ordinary people and against the fat cats and the educated class; for the small towns and against the financial centers.
And it has always had the same morality, which the historian Michael Kazin has called producerism. The idea is that free labor is the essence of Americanism. Hard-working ordinary people, who create wealth in material ways, are the moral backbone of the country. In this free, capitalist nation, people should be held responsible for their own output. Money should not be redistributed to those who do not work, and it should not be sucked off by condescending, manipulative elites.
Barack Obama leads a government of the highly educated. His movement includes urban politicians, academics, Hollywood donors and information-age professionals. In his first few months, he has fused federal power with Wall Street, the auto industry, the health care industries and the energy sector.
Given all of this, it was guaranteed that he would spark a populist backlash, regardless of his skin color. And it was guaranteed that this backlash would be ill mannered, conspiratorial and over the top — since these movements always are, whether they were led by Huey Long, Father Coughlin or anybody else.
Barry Jive wrote:I don't entirely agree with his initial premise, and he doesn't completely back it up, but that was a great column.
Werthless wrote:FTN wrote:lol peter schiff
I like people like him. I wish there were more professional people making runs for Congress.
Rococo4 wrote:jeff2sf wrote:I should point out here, lest smoothie accuses me of being flip, that I'm sure the job loss was no fault of your own, that I know being unemployed sucks, and that I hope you get a job tomorrow.
i didnt take any offense to that. i actually probably am getting a job tomorrow.