TenuredVulture wrote:dajafi wrote:Sure. DeLay guessed that the partisan ID trend was with him to a point where he could take districts that were, say, +15 and +5, and make them both +10. My sense is that CA is much more inclined toward really, really safe seats. They've had a few change hands--Richard Pombo's is the one I remember--but not many.
I think Delay's plan would take a +10 district and a -5 district to create two +7.5 districts. My understanding is the defense of the plan was to create a delegation that had a partisan alignment that more close matched that of the state. The Texas Republican party, thanks to Rove and Bush, hasn't alienated Hispanic voters to the extent it has elsewhere, so the swing at the Congressional level isn't as substantial as it might otherwise be.
However, incumbency is still a huge advantage.
Bad math. A +10 district and a -5 district would give two +2.5 districts, but that is not so much how the game is worked. You aggregate the black voters in one district. Thus, districts that are +2, -5, -5 can be transformed into +15, +15, -40. The neatest trick about this is that the new black incumbent in the -34 district will fight tooth and nail to preserve this gerrymander that gave Delay's side two safe districts out of a marginal district and two losers.