Wizlah wrote:1 wrote:burrell with an extended congrats to coste
was that because it was genuinely heartfelt, or because it was in slow motion.
1 wrote:Wizlah wrote:1 wrote:burrell with an extended congrats to coste
was that because it was genuinely heartfelt, or because it was in slow motion.
it was because he has nothing else to do but watch
Wizlah wrote:1 wrote:Wizlah wrote:1 wrote:burrell with an extended congrats to coste
was that because it was genuinely heartfelt, or because it was in slow motion.
it was because he has nothing else to do but watch
What a team player. He contributes every way he can.
philliesphhan wrote:I'd LOVE to know what their argument for keeping Helms over Coste at this point is
1 wrote:Wizlah wrote:1 wrote:Wizlah wrote:1 wrote:burrell with an extended congrats to coste
was that because it was genuinely heartfelt, or because it was in slow motion.
it was because he has nothing else to do but watch
What a team player. He contributes every way he can.
ah, intangibles
you're making philaphans cry
Ace Rothstein wrote:philliesphhan wrote:I'd LOVE to know what their argument for keeping Helms over Coste at this point is
the same reason polanco was moved for a average relief pitcher
philliesphhan wrote:I'd LOVE to know what their argument for keeping Helms over Coste at this point is
drsmooth wrote:it's really easy to hate the mets
trouble is, it's almost as easy - as, for example, after a Coste HR - to hate phils management even more.
Wizlah wrote:Ace Rothstein wrote:philliesphhan wrote:I'd LOVE to know what their argument for keeping Helms over Coste at this point is
the same reason polanco was moved for a average relief pitcher
Exactly. If we sent helms down, the marlins, braves or the mets would snap him up, and we'd regret it later this season.