Rolling politics thread...

Postby Didn't I? » Tue Sep 25, 2007 15:39:29

The Red Tornado wrote:The blacks in Harlem must be so well spoken.


I was in Harlem once for a good 20 minutes and didn't get mugged - not even once!
​​"Big Dick Nick stepped the fuck up." - An Eagles fan with an eye patch

Didn't I?
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 6570
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 19:29:17
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Postby dajafi » Tue Sep 25, 2007 15:43:07

phdave wrote:I'm all for treating this as good news, but I can't help seeing an agenda in his comments. I don't think Bill was merely relaying his insight into cultural similarities. I think this was more along the lines of, see we're all the same so why would we need to have things like affirmative action? Why are there people who keep bringing up race when it does not belong? There really are no problems with race and racial tension is just fueled by certain leaders who are just trying to generate support for themselves by fanning flames of racism.

Here is the quote on which I am basing my interpretation of what he was getting at with the description of this meal:

O'Reilly also stated: "I think black Americans are starting to think more and more for themselves. They're getting away from the Sharptons and the [Rev. Jesse] Jacksons and the people trying to lead them into a race-based culture. They're just trying to figure it out. 'Look, I can make it. If I work hard and get educated, I can make it."


Maybe that's where he is going. I'm not afraid to have that conversation, though; I don't think any progressive should be.

As for "the Sharptons and the Jacksons"... I must admit I'm increasingly sympathetic to his point here. Probably the most encouraging political development of this decade--and god knows we've needed any good news we can find--is the emergence of excellent politicians and public officials who "happen to black" more than they're "black politicians." Obama (my presidential candidate of choice), certainly, but also Deval Patrick, Cory Booker, Artur Davis, even arguably Jesse Jackson Jr.

It also hasn't hurt that some of the great liberal lions who are African-American, like Rangel and Conyers, finally got positions of national prominence with the House takeover last year. Those are guys who, if they were 40 years younger, might be serious presidential candidates in their own right.

All those guys, and their private-sector contemporaries, are much more credible "black leaders" than Jackson (IMO a basically good man who's just squandered his credibility with mis-steps and indiscretions) and Sharpton (a straight-up scumbag from Tawana Brawley through Roger Stone, who's sometimes found himself on the side of the angels because it happened to serve his ambitions at the time).

dajafi
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 24567
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 20:03:18
Location: Brooklyn

Postby Woody » Tue Sep 25, 2007 15:45:03

O and A did a nice number on O'Reilly about this whole thing this morning
you sure do seem to have a lot of time on your hands to be on this forum? Do you have a job? Are you a shut-in?

Woody
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 52472
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 17:56:45
Location: captain of the varsity slut team

Postby Stay_Disappointed » Wed Sep 26, 2007 18:54:06

Defense Secretary Robert Gates will ask Congress on Wednesday to approve nearly $190 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2008


awesome
I would rather see you lose than win myself

Stay_Disappointed
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 15051
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 15:44:46
Location: down in the park

Postby dajafi » Wed Sep 26, 2007 18:58:58

Warszawa wrote:
Defense Secretary Robert Gates will ask Congress on Wednesday to approve nearly $190 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in 2008


awesome


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWCtfUgBtNw[/youtube]

dajafi
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 24567
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 20:03:18
Location: Brooklyn

Postby dajafi » Sun Oct 07, 2007 17:11:27

Hysterical ad "for" Mitt Romney, from the Log Cabin Republicans:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Elx3UWmyAY4

dajafi
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 24567
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 20:03:18
Location: Brooklyn

Postby Disco Stu » Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:04:07

Republicans very torn today.

Gore wins the Nobel Peace Prize but Ted Kennedy in sugery. Odds are Fox talks about Teddy a bit more than Gore.
Check The Good Phight, you might learn something.

Disco Stu
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 9600
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 19:37:30
Location: Land of the banned

Postby dajafi » Mon Oct 15, 2007 12:35:42

Great article about Hillary Clinton's Coronation Campaign:

Her campaign has been brilliant. It is great at small stuff like bracket scheduling -- making sure she or a surrogate appears right before and after a major appearance by an opponent. It is equally good on big stuff. Eight months ago, Clinton, 59, was bedeviled by the party's antiwar base for her initial support of the Iraq conflict; today it's practically a non-issue.

The Clinton campaign is efficient, effective, disciplined and tough.

It also seems to be joyless, humorless and lacking in heart and soul.

A take-no-prisoners, us vs. them mindset has served her well.
...
Her campaign is tailored to that approach. There are lots of titles and talk of a diverse set of decision-makers. The real impresario is Mark Penn, a brilliant, socially inept disciple of Dick Morris, the scandal-tainted former guru to Bill Clinton.
...
He has an unsurpassed grasp of the many parts of the American electorate; not as clear is whether he understands the whole. And that's the way he's directing the campaign. It is unequaled for 14-point programs. Yet other than offering voters a Clinton restoration, there's little sense of mission.

The Penn political model isn't Bill Clinton's successful 1992 challenge for the presidency. It is more Karl Rove, who masterminded George W. Bush's victories. Devise a comprehensive game plan replete with exhaustive numbers and historical context, and execute it with iron discipline.
...
Rove, for all his genius, wasn't good at adapting. That almost cost Bush the 2000 election and doomed the president's top second-term domestic priority, the overhaul of Social Security, a campaign Rove also orchestrated.

The hunch from other political experts is that Penn, a public relations man when he isn't directing the Clinton campaign, has the same weakness. He is the best at data and demographics, not so great at understanding people. That's fine as long as you control the agenda; political campaigns have a way, however, of spiraling out of control.

Campaigns, it is said, are a reflection of the candidate. Senator Clinton herself is often a control freak. That trait was honed during the Clinton administration controversies -- some really were attributable to what she called the ``vast right- wing conspiracy'' -- but she came to the White House with much of that state of mind.


It's the "discipline" of the Clinton campaign that I find both most revealing and most distasteful. None of her spokeszombies ever make a statement that doesn't include the phrase "strength and experience." And while she offers a lot of detail on policy proposals--some of which sound pretty good to me--the detail disappears in the face of questioners.

A great brief for why progressives should distrust and oppose Clinton comes from the semi-endorsement she received from right-wing columnist Charles Krauthammer last week:

I could never vote for her, but I (and others of my ideological ilk) could live with her -- precisely because she is so liberated from principle. Her liberalism, like her husband's -- flexible, disciplined, calculated, triangulated -- always leaves open the possibility that she would do the right thing for the blessedly wrong (i.e., self-interested, ambition-serving, politically expedient) reason.
...
On Iraq, for example, she talks like someone who knows she may soon be commander in chief and will need room to maneuver in order to achieve whatever success might be possible. Clinton has emphatically refused to give assurances that she would get us out of Iraq during her first term.
...
Even Clinton's response to a debate question on torture -- "As a matter of policy it cannot be American policy, period" -- is elegantly phrased to imply an implacable opposition to torture and yet leave open the possibility that in extreme circumstances a president would do what she had to do, i.e., authorize torture, regardless of the express policy.


No adherence to principle, a possible willingness to torture... yeah, if you can't get Romney, she's the next-best thing for those who think the last seven years have been swell.

dajafi
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 24567
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 20:03:18
Location: Brooklyn

Postby BuddyGroom » Mon Oct 15, 2007 14:37:15

Krauthammer wrote: "I could never vote for her, but I (and others of my ideological ilk) could live with her -- precisely because she is so liberated from principle. Her liberalism, like her husband's -- flexible, disciplined, calculated, triangulated -- always leaves open the possibility that she would do the right thing for the blessedly wrong (i.e., self-interested, ambition-serving, politically expedient) reason."

I am not a big fan of Hilary Clinton, but I wouldn't use the descriptions of Charles Krauthammer to define her. Do you think he sees any progressive, any Democrat, in admirable terms?

Hilary is at best my third choice, behind Obama and Edwards, but I have little doubt she'd be a huge improvement over Bush. For that matter, I think several of the Republicans - McCain and Huckabee, to be sure, and Giuliani, possibly - would be a big improvement over Bush.

Conservative commentators having been making Hilary (and Bill) out to be little more than criminals for almost two decades. Please consider the source.
BuddyGroom
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 3075
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 14:16:17

Postby TenuredVulture » Mon Oct 15, 2007 15:05:49

BuddyGroom wrote:Hilary is at best my third choice, behind Obama and Edwards, but I have little doubt she'd be a (like safeco) improvement over Bush. For that matter, I think several of the Republicans - McCain and Huckabee, to be sure, and Giuliani, possibly - would be a big improvement over Bush.



I would like the Democratic nominee to have more going for her (or him) than simply not being Bush. Disco Stu is not Bush, but I'm not voting for him.

The most troubling thing about Hillary to me is the continuation of a dynasty. In a sense, Hillary turns what was best about Bill Clinton's Presidency on its head. Bill Clinton's Presidency meant that any American, regardless how humble his beginnings, could rise to the Presidency. Hillary's Presidency would mean, like that of Bush, that connections are all that matter. We're edging closer and closer to a kind of weird celebrity/monarchical government in this country.

With Hillary, you'd probably get a more competent administration than with Bush (though don't be too sure here--Bill's administration had more than its share of hacks) but I'm not sure that would be a good thing.
Be Bold!

TenuredVulture
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 53243
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 00:16:10
Location: Magnolia, AR

Postby dajafi » Mon Oct 15, 2007 15:32:46

I detest Mitt Romney, and I'm sure he'd be an enormous improvement over Bush. To improve over Bush, you need only a glimmer of intellectual curiosity and some determination to provide competent management.

I don't doubt that Sen. Clinton has more than a glimmer of intellectual curiosity, and her management of the executive branch, while likely not great, will be better than the Current Occupant and probably better than Bill's, just by virtue of learning from some of his mistakes.

At the same time, I just feel that if we elect her, perpetuating the dynasty and empowering someone who shares many of the basic premises and principles of the current administration--from the concept of politics as zero-sum partisan struggle to unquestioning acceptance that we're an empire and are entitled to act like one--we're done as a democracy.

Then again, maybe we're already done as a democracy, and the best we can hope for is to preserve the democratic toolkit so as to allow some future generation of Americans to put them to use. But I'd rather see an Obama or Edwards or Dodd (I know he's got no shot, but I like the guy) try to prove me wrong than just enshrine another Celebrity Politician and validate her authoritarian temperament.

Also, I'd vote for Disco Stu in a heartbeat. Guy's got the kind of common sense that's none too common in these sad times.

dajafi
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 24567
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 20:03:18
Location: Brooklyn

Postby Disco Stu » Mon Oct 15, 2007 16:50:04

dajafi wrote:Also, I'd vote for Disco Stu in a heartbeat. Guy's got the kind of common sense that's none too common in these sad times.


I can't run, I don't have any skeletons in my closet.
Check The Good Phight, you might learn something.

Disco Stu
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 9600
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 19:37:30
Location: Land of the banned

Postby Disco Stu » Mon Oct 15, 2007 16:51:44

Richardson is angling for the Hillary VP nominee. If I were Hillary or Obama, no way do I take the other. That is just asking for some nut job to off one so that the other becomes president.
Check The Good Phight, you might learn something.

Disco Stu
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 9600
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 19:37:30
Location: Land of the banned

Postby dajafi » Tue Oct 16, 2007 23:56:26

Hillary donors vs. Obama donors

Now someone needs to go through the records and see how many of those maxed-out Clinton donors also gave to Bush in '00 or '04.

dajafi
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 24567
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 20:03:18
Location: Brooklyn

Postby Monkeyboy » Fri Oct 19, 2007 02:10:17

I almost put this in the music thread, but I figured it went best here.

Death Cab For Cutie Guitarist Baffled By Homeland Security's Seizure Of His Album


And though his song files might have disappeared into a web of government bureaucracy, Walla does still have the tapes containing all his songs, which he's now trying to master and mix on his own in order to have the record out — Lord willin' — in January.

"Luckily, the tapes are Plan B, so while I'm bummed about the whole thing, it could be a whole lot worse," he laughed. "I still get to play music. I mean, I'm not at Guantánamo or anything like that. I mean, my drive might be. They could be water-boarding my drive for all I know."

And though Walla's laughing when he mentions Guantánamo, he's not joking when he adds that his record — which he's calling Field Manual — is "very political," packed with songs about issues both foreign ("The Score" tackles the war in Iraq) and domestic ("Everyone Needs a Home" deals with the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina; "Sing Again" is about so-called "morning after" pills and whether they're a form of contraception or abortion). Easy listening, this is not.
Agnostic dyslexic insomniacs lay awake all night wondering if there is a Dog.

Monkeyboy
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 28452
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 21:01:51
Location: Beijing

Postby Houshphandzadeh » Fri Oct 19, 2007 09:10:11

Field Manual — is "very political," packed with songs about issues both foreign ("The Score" tackles the war in Iraq) and domestic ("Everyone Needs a Home" deals with the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina; "Sing Again" is about so-called "morning after" pills and whether they're a form of contraception or abortion). Easy listening, this is not.

Bet that track will be killer.

Houshphandzadeh
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 64362
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 19:15:12
Location: nascar victory

Postby Stay_Disappointed » Tue Oct 23, 2007 15:22:50

From MSNBC.COM:
Federal emergency declared
President Bush declared a federal emergency for seven counties, a move that will speed disaster-relief efforts. He also sent federal disaster officials to California.


Lets go FEMA!

In other news evangelicals have declared all those queer californians have gotten what they deserve.
I would rather see you lose than win myself

Stay_Disappointed
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 15051
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 15:44:46
Location: down in the park

Postby Disco Stu » Tue Oct 30, 2007 06:09:37

This is pretty ridiculous...

http://www.crooksandliars.com/Media/Pla ... -Osama.wmv

Mitt Romney's quote:

"Actually, just look at what Osam — Barack Obama — said just yesterday. Barack Obama, calling on radicals, jihadists of all different types, to come together in Iraq. That is the battlefield. That’s the central place he says, ‘come join us under one banner.’ "

He started off saying it right and then switched to Barak Obama's name and used it again. And he didn't even muff the name like you normally would, but he went to his first name. Dirtballs...
Check The Good Phight, you might learn something.

Disco Stu
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 9600
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 19:37:30
Location: Land of the banned

Postby dajafi » Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:29:20

I was just looking at PoliticalWire.com and saw an ad on the side of the page:

Phillies in 2008

Needless to say, I clicked, and...

dajafi
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 24567
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 20:03:18
Location: Brooklyn

Postby Bucky » Tue Oct 30, 2007 10:37:44

well, he's got my vote.

Bucky
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 58018
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 19:24:05
Location: You_Still_Have_To_Visit_Us

PreviousNext