1 wrote:swishnicholson wrote:1 wrote:Kenny G! Favorite prospect.
Bill's grandson?
Nickname: Napken

1 wrote:swishnicholson wrote:1 wrote:Kenny G! Favorite prospect.
Bill's grandson?
Nickname: Napken
It was reported by both city newspapers and the Associated Press that "Wheels" and "Sarge" were casualties of the reported 25-year, $2.5 billion television contract forged between the Phillies and Comcast SportsNet, which affords the club an equity share in that branch of the massive Comcast empire. If so, it's hard to believe it was a deal-breaker. More likely, it went something like this:
"Oh, one other thing . . .
"Actually, two . . . "
It also was reported that Comcast will find one replacement for the two deposed broadcasters, reversing the strategy employed in its 2-for-1 on Luukko.
What does all this mean for the average fan? Maybe that Comcast, to this point a rather quiet, little, multibillion-dollar entity, has decided to become more overt in the day-to-day operations of its sports entities.
And that might not be good news for Ruben Amaro Jr.
Maybe that Comcast, to this point a rather quiet, little, multibillion-dollar entity, has decided to become more overt in the day-to-day operations of its sports entities.
Bucky wrote:Hmmm, the premise of the article itself is flawed. So anything after that is poppycock.Maybe that Comcast, to this point a rather quiet, little, multibillion-dollar entity, has decided to become more overt in the day-to-day operations of its sports entities.
The Philles are NOT a comcast entity. Comcast SportsNet IS 25% a Phillies entity. Comcast does own the *broadcasts*, which gives them say over the broadcast team. Apples and studabakers.
Doll Is Mine wrote:His sneakers are filthy.
Squire wrote:At some point I Hope that Rube is calling Garza and offering one year at 17m, 2 at 29m or 3 at 36m. His choice.