kruker wrote:The one guy I wish would do a farewell tour. If the voters are to be trusted, he should get at least 98% of the vote on the first ballot.
CFP wrote:Well, he'll be the first of the "Big Three" to go in. Glavine I presume will retire next, then Smoltz? Smoltz I think wants to stick around forever.
dajafi wrote:kruker wrote:The one guy I wish would do a farewell tour. If the voters are to be trusted, he should get at least 98% of the vote on the first ballot.
I've long thought he could be the first guy to go in unanimously. Nobody doubts his greatness, and he hasn't pissed off reporters to my knowledge. (And nobody make a "pissed on" joke...)
The only reason not to vote for Maddux would be out of some dumbassed notion that "nobody should go in unanimously since Babe Ruth (or whoever) didn't. It's true that at least a few BBWAA members are probably obnoxious and arrogant enough to make a decision on that basis, but they should be--and will be--mocked mercilessly for doing so.
Ok, fun contest for the day. Find the top 10 five year stretches for ERA+. So, five consecutive years, add up the ERA+ for the pitcher, divide by 5, and you get your total. The only caveat, none of the seasons included can be below 150 IP. That eliminates one run of Pedro's stretch, because he only threw 116 innings in 2001. Here is Pedro's best
1996-2000: 117, 219, 163, 243, 291 = 207 average
Just did Maddux
1994-1998: 271, 262, 162, 189, 187 = 214
phdave wrote:Did you put them in your bicycle spokes?
philliesphhan wrote:I liked when he pitched what might have been his last game in Philadelphia (and it would have been had he not been traded to LA), the fans gave him a nice ovation when he was taken out of the game. Oh wait, it was Philly, better fix this story for the national media. Maddux was hit with five batteries, dressed up as Santa, and then booed when he left the field.