traderdave wrote:Adolf, of course, will probably miss the sarcasm in Tusk's tweet and agree that the EU should be grateful to and for him.

man you showed him

First, I have been calling him that since before he was elected. Second, TRUMP probably does not read the BSG message board, so I doubt I showed him anything. Third, who pissed in your Cheerios?

Apparently, Mueller's team informed Trump's attorneys that they concede that they do not have the authority to indict a sitting President.

Trump called illegal immigrants animals

Squire wrote:Apparently, Mueller's team informed Trump's attorneys that they concede that they do not have the authority to indict a sitting President.

but added "we totally fucking would if we could, I mean my God look at all these crimes"

So 45 will get away with it then right?

This is all according to Giuliani, though, right? Has anyone confirmed?

So by making that statement is Giuliani admitting that trump committed an indictable offense?

Did someone think that there was an incitement possible? I had thought it was that crimes would be turned over to congress for impeachment, and after being thrown out of office, then an indictment could happen. 'I am not a crook' sounds familiar.

Just today, I've probably read at least 10 news stories about the Trump admin committing a crime. Something will stick to this guy. It's inevitable.

Later, not sooner unfortunately.

Bannon was working to divide and suppress black voters. Who knew.

Congrats to our own Mozart or Wolfgang or whatever for winning his primary in PA-29

Trump +4 Romney +7, certainly winnable given the mood.

Good luck to Moz. One Dem I can root for this November

I don't understand why they can't indict a sitting president. Nobody is supposed to be above the law.

anyway, he'll be indicted eventually, assuming he's ever not president again. Russians will probably steal him another win in 2020 and then he'll die in office while banging an intern and eating a big Mac.

But seriously, if he knows he's not going to be indicted until he's not president, is there any doubt that he'll start floating the idea of making himself president for life, like his buddy Xi? I mean, if his choice is jail or tearing down our democracy, there's no way he doesn't protect himself.

Also, what about his kids? Are they going to get away with it too? Is he just going to pardon them, even though he's a co-conspirator?

Finally, Mueller is a republican and we all saw what Comey did. I will not be surprised at all if Mueller ends up pulling a Comey and siding with party over country. I'm pretty sure it's a prerequisite these days.

surprised theres no mention of the scrubbing of SAR's of Cohen's transactions by the Treasury department (or Meuller/SDNY) that is pretty huge news

if, as speculated above, this is only from giuliani, i'm not sure i believe it.

Bucky wrote:if, as speculated above, this is only from giuliani, i'm not sure i believe it.

also Meuller may have just told him that to make them feel more at ease in being interviewed (LE is allowed to lie)

jerseyhoya wrote:Trump +4 Romney +7, certainly winnable given the mood.

Good luck to Moz. One Dem I can root for this November

he'd flip that, too. one step closer to a majority in the House

good luck moz!